Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034683›Full record

ArticleSpringerPlus2014

Leptin receptor polymorphism Gln223Arg (rs1137101) in oral squamous cell carcinoma and potentially malignant oral lesions.

Patrícia Luciana Batista Domingos, Lucyana Conceição Farias, Camila Santos Pereira, Geórgia das Graças Pena, Tatiana Carvalho Reis, Rosângela Ramos Veloso Silva, Carlos Alberto de Carvalho Fraga, Marcela Gonçalves de Souza, Mariana Batista Soares, Kimberly Marie Jones and 6 more

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in SpringerPlus, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Investigation ofBioscience reports · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrícia Luciana Batista DomingosDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Lucyana Conceição FariasDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Camila Santos PereiraDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Geórgia das Graças PenaSchool of Nursing, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil.
Tatiana Carvalho ReisDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Rosângela Ramos Veloso SilvaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Carlos Alberto de Carvalho FragaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Marcela Gonçalves de SouzaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Mariana Batista SoaresDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Kimberly Marie JonesDean of Research, Associação Educativa do Brasil (SOEBRAS), Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Elytania Veiga MenezesDepartment of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Sérgio Avelino Mota NobreDepartment of Biology, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
João Felício Rodrigues NetoDepartment of Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Alfredo Maurício Batista de PaulaDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Jorge Gustavo Velásquez-MeléndezSchool of Nursing, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG Brazil.
André Luiz Sena GuimarãesDepartment of Dentistry, Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros, Montes Claros, Minas Gerais Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros · BRUniversidade Federal de Minas Gerais · BRAção Educativa · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to assess the LEPR gene Gln223Arg polymorphism (rs1137101) in oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and in potentially malignant oral lesions (PMOL) in comparison to normal oral mucosa in a Brazilian population. Smokers (n = 89) were selected from a representative sample of 471 individuals from the general population of Montes Claros, Brazil. Participants were age and gender matched to patients with OSCC (n = 25) and oral epithelial dysplasia (n = 25). We investigated the LEPR Gln223Arg polymorphism (A>G; rs1137101) in these groups. Genotype variants were assessed by RFLP-PCR, using MspI (HPAII) restriction endonuclease. The institutional review board of the Universidade Estadual de Montes Claros approved the study (process number 2667/2011). Written informed consent for this study was obtained from all participants. The GG genotype (Arg223Arg) appears to be the more relevant polymorphic variant in OSCC. It occurred, approximately, twice as frequently in OSCC patients than in the general population. In contrast, the A allele in its homozygosis form (Gln223Gln) is significantly associated with the development of PMOL; 80% of the samples from the PMOL group exhibit AA genotype. Our findings suggest new insights regarding LEPR gene variations in the development of OSCC and PMOL.

Indexed as

LeptinLeptin receptorOral squamous cell carcinomaPolymorphismPotentially malignant oral lesionSNP

Identifiers

PMID26034683
PMCPMC4447719
OpenAlexW2118389055

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.