Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034359›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Laboratory test variables useful for distinguishing upper from lower gastrointestinal bleeding.

Minoru Tomizawa, Fuminobu Shinozaki, Rumiko Hasegawa, Yoshinori Shirai, Yasufumi Motoyoshi, Takao Sugiyama, Shigenori Yamamoto, Naoki Ishige

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Minoru TomizawaMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Fuminobu ShinozakiMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Rumiko HasegawaMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Yoshinori ShiraiMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Yasufumi MotoyoshiMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Takao SugiyamaMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Shigenori YamamotoMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.
Naoki IshigeMinoru Tomizawa, Department of Gastroenterology, National Hospital Organization Shimoshizu Hospital, Chiba 284-0003, Japan.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo distinguish upper from lower gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding.

methodsPatient records between April 2011 and March 2014 were analyzed retrospectively (3296 upper endoscopy, and 1520 colonoscopy). Seventy-six patients had upper GI bleeding (Upper group) and 65 had lower GI bleeding (Lower group). Variables were compared between the groups using one-way analysis of variance. Logistic regression was performed to identify variables significantly associated with the diagnosis of upper vs lower GI bleeding. Receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) analysis was performed to determine the threshold value that could distinguish upper from lower GI bleeding.

resultsHemoglobin (P = 0.023), total protein (P = 0.0002), and lactate dehydrogenase (P = 0.009) were significantly lower in the Upper group than in the Lower group. Blood urea nitrogen (BUN) was higher in the Upper group than in the Lower group (P = 0.0065). Logistic regression analysis revealed that BUN was most strongly associated with the diagnosis of upper vs lower GI bleeding. ROC analysis revealed a threshold BUN value of 21.0 mg/dL, with a specificity of 93.0%.

conclusionThe threshold BUN value for distinguishing upper from lower GI bleeding was 21.0 mg/dL.

Indexed as

Endoscopy, GastrointestinalAgedAged, 80 and overArea Under CurveBiomarkersBlood Urea NitrogenColonoscopyDiagnosis, DifferentialFemaleGastrointestinal HemorrhageHemoglobinsHumansLikelihood FunctionsLogistic ModelsMaleMiddle AgedBiomarkersHemoglobinsBlood urine nitrogenHemoglobinLikelihood analysisLogistic regression analysisReceiver-operator characteristic analysis

Identifiers

PMID26034359
PMCPMC4445101

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.