Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034355›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of gastroenterology2015

Expression of COX-2 and HER-2 in colorectal cancer and their correlation.

Qi-Bing Wu, Guo-Ping Sun

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of gastroenterology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 68 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. COX-2/C-MET/KRAS status-based prognostic nomogram for colorectal cancer: A multicenter cohort study.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Targeting inflammation as cancer therapy.Journal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. NSAIDs and Cancer Resolution: New Paradigms beyond Cyclooxygenase.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Qi-Bing WuQi-Bing Wu, Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Guo-Ping SunQi-Bing Wu, Department of Radiotherapy, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei 230022, Anhui Province, China.
Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo detect the expression of COX-2 and HER-2 in colorectal cancer and to analyze their correlation and clinical significance.

methodsA total of 1026 colorectal cancer surgical specimens were collected from patients treated from December 2002 to December 2007 at the First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University. All specimens were made into 4-μm slices. The expression of COX-2 and HER-2 were detected by immunohistochemistry using the streptavidin-biotin-peroxidase method. The correlations between COX-2 and HER-2 expression and colorectal cancer clinical features were analyzed.

resultsThe positive rates of COX-2 and HER-2 expression in colorectal cancer were 77.97% (800/1026) and 46.20% (474/1026), respectively. There was a significant correlation between COX-2 and HER-2 expression in colorectal cancer (P < 0.05). In patients with tumor size ≥ 5 cm, the positive rates of COX-2 and HER-2 expression were 81.48% (308/378) and 57.94% (219/378), respectively. In patients with serosal invasion, the positive COX-2 and HER-2 expression rates were 80.53% (612/760) and 49.21% (374/760), respectively. In patients with lymph node metastasis, the positive expression rates were 85.04% (506/595) and 54.62% (325/595), respectively, and the positive expression rates differed significantly between patients with lymph node metastasis and those without (P < 0.05). In patients with Duke's C and D colorectal cancer, the positive COX-2 and HER-2 expression rates were 82.80% (443/535) and 57.94% (310/535), respectively. In patients with poorly differentiated colorectal cancer, the positive expression rates were 74.49% (210/282) and 52.84% (149/282), respectively (P < 0.05). In patients with distant metastasis, the positive expression rates were 82.27% (116/141) and 53.90% (76/141), respectively (P < 0.05). These findings suggest that COX-2 and HER-2 have synergistic effects in colorectal cancer. COX-2 and HER-2 expression had no significant correlation with sex, age, or tumor location.

conclusionCOX-2 and HER-2 are important markers for invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer, and they act together to regulate the invasion and metastasis of colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCell DifferentiationColorectal NeoplasmsCyclooxygenase 2Erb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryKaplan-Meier EstimateMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm InvasivenessBiomarkers, TumorCyclooxygenase 2ERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPTGS2 protein, humanColorectal cancerCorrelationCOX-2HER-2ImmunohistochemistrySurvival rate

Identifiers

PMID26034355
PMCPMC4445097
OpenAlexW2397006483

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.