Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034267›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2015

DNA metabarcoding illuminates dietary niche partitioning by African large herbivores.

Tyler R Kartzinel, Patricia A Chen, Tyler C Coverdale, David L Erickson, W John Kress, Maria L Kuzmina, Daniel I Rubenstein, Wei Wang, Robert M Pringle

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 182 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
182citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

182 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Seasonal Diet Variation in Reintroduced Milu (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

122 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tyler R KartzinelDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; tylerk@princeton.edu rpringle@princeton.edu.
Patricia A ChenDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;
Tyler C CoverdaleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544;
David L EricksonDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013;
W John KressDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013;
Maria L KuzminaDepartment of Botany, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC 20013;
Daniel I RubensteinDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya;
Wei WangLewis Sigler Institute, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544.
Robert M PringleDepartment of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; Mpala Research Centre, Nanyuki, Kenya; tylerk@princeton.edu rpringle@princeton.edu.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Niche partitioning facilitates species coexistence in a world of limited resources, thereby enriching biodiversity. For decades, biologists have sought to understand how diverse assemblages of large mammalian herbivores (LMH) partition food resources. Several complementary mechanisms have been identified, including differential consumption of grasses versus nongrasses and spatiotemporal stratification in use of different parts of the same plant. However, the extent to which LMH partition food-plant species is largely unknown because comprehensive species-level identification is prohibitively difficult with traditional methods. We used DNA metabarcoding to quantify diet breadth, composition, and overlap for seven abundant LMH species (six wild, one domestic) in semiarid African savanna. These species ranged from almost-exclusive grazers to almost-exclusive browsers: Grass consumption inferred from mean sequence relative read abundance (RRA) ranged from >99% (plains zebra) to <1% (dik-dik). Grass RRA was highly correlated with isotopic estimates of % grass consumption, indicating that RRA conveys reliable quantitative information about consumption. Dietary overlap was greatest between species that were similar in body size and proportional grass consumption. Nonetheless, diet composition differed between all species-even pairs of grazers matched in size, digestive physiology, and location-and dietary similarity was sometimes greater across grazing and browsing guilds than within them. Such taxonomically fine-grained diet partitioning suggests that coarse trophic categorizations may generate misleading conclusions about competition and coexistence in LMH assemblages, and that LMH diversity may be more tightly linked to plant diversity than is currently recognized.

Indexed as

DNA Barcoding, TaxonomicHerbivoryAfricaAnimalsAnimals, WildBiodiversityAfrican savannasbody sizecoexistencecompetitionungulates

Identifiers

PMID26034267
PMCPMC4491742

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.