Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26034248›Full record

Trial reportPediatrics2015

Medical-Legal Strategies to Improve Infant Health Care: A Randomized Trial.

Robert Sege, Genevieve Preer, Samantha J Morton, Howard Cabral, Oluwatomisin Morakinyo, Vonne Lee, Catarina Abreu, Edward De Vos, Margot Kaplan-Sanoff

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Pediatrics, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01343940 (Project Dulce), which is not on this map. Cited by 57 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
57citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
11.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01343940 phase2 / phase3completednot on this map

Project Dulce: Developmental Understanding and Legal Collaboration for Everyone

TypeinterventionalSponsorBoston Medical CenterRan2011 to 2013Enrolled402ConditionsParenting, Child Rearing, Child Abuse, Child NeglectArmsProject dulce, Safety intervention
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

57 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Health-harming legal needs in a perinatal medical-legal partnership.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  13. Continuum of care for patients through medical-legal partnership: improving the transition from NICU stay to home.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Robert SegeDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine, rsege@hria.org.
Genevieve PreerDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine.
Samantha J MortonMedical-Legal Partnership | Boston, Boston, Massachusetts; and.
Howard CabralDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts;
Oluwatomisin MorakinyoDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine.
Vonne LeeDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine.
Catarina AbreuDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine.
Edward De VosWilliam James College (formerly the Massachusetts School of Professional Psychology), Newton, Massachusetts.
Margot Kaplan-SanoffDepartment of Pediatrics, Boston Medical Center and Boston University School of Medicine.
Boston University · USBoston Medical Center · USWilliam James College · US

Funding

NCI NIH HHS 90CA1763
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundChanges in health care delivery create opportunities to improve systems to better meet the needs of low-income families while achieving quality benchmarks.

methodsFamilies of healthy newborns receiving primary care at a single large urban safety-net hospital participated. Intervention families were randomly assigned a family specialist who provided support until the 6-month routine health care visit. The Developmental Understanding and Legal Collaboration for Everyone (DULCE) intervention is based on the Strengthening Families approach and incorporated components of the Healthy Steps and Medical-Legal Partnership models. Medical record reviews determined use of preventive and emergency care. Surveys conducted at baseline, postintervention (6 months), and follow-up (12 months) were used to determine hardship and attainment of concrete supports.

resultsThree hundred thirty families participated in the study. At baseline, 73% of families reported economic hardships. Intervention parents had an average of 14 contacts with the family specialist, and 5 hours of total contact time. Intervention infants were more likely to have completed their 6-month immunization schedule by age 7 months (77% vs 63%, P < .005) and by 8 months (88% vs 77%, P < .01). Intervention infants were more likely to have 5 or more routine preventive care visits by age 1 year (78% vs 67%, P < .01) and were less likely to have visited the emergency department by age 6 months (37% vs 49.7%, P < .03). The DULCE intervention accelerated access to concrete resources (P = .029).

conclusionsAssignment to the Project DULCE intervention led to improvements in preventive health care delivery and utilization and accelerated access to concrete supports among low-income families.

Indexed as

Infant WelfareAdolescentAdultChildChild Health ServicesDelivery of Health CareFemaleHealth PromotionHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansInfantInfant CareInfant, NewbornMaleParentsPoverty

Identifiers

PMID26034248
PMCPMC9923600
OpenAlexW1942593987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.