ReviewJournal of leukocyte biology2015
The future of murine sepsis and trauma research models.
Review in Journal of leukocyte biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 73 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
73 citing papers in PubMed.
- Optimization of Preclinical Rodent Research Models of Human Shock: Part One Intra-Abdominal Sepsis.Shock (Augusta, Ga.) · 2026Review
- Differential Effects of Endothelial Cell- as opposed to Neutrophil-Lineage Restricted PD-L1 Gene Expression on Experimental Murine Shock/ Sepsis-Induced Lung Injury.Research square · 2025Article
- Age- and Sex- Driven Transcriptional and Metabolic Diversity in Myeloid-Derived Suppressor Cells After Mouse Sepsis.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Mechanisms of immune suppression in sepsis/shock: one investigator's/lab group's experience (SLB 2024 legacy award presentation).Journal of leukocyte biology · 2025Article
- Prioritizing FDA approved therapeutics for treating sepsis phenotypes: A network modeling approach based on neutrophil proteomics.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
- Article
- A rat model of multicompartmental traumatic injury and hemorrhagic shock induces bone marrow dysfunction and profound anemia.Animal models and experimental medicine · 2024Article
- Persistent inflammation, immunosuppression, and catabolism syndrome (PICS): a review of definitions, potential therapies, and research priorities.British journal of anaesthesia · 2024Review
- Targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9): from bench to bedside.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2024Review
- CD115Cell reports · 2023Article
- Platelet factor 4 limits neutrophil extracellular trap- and cell-free DNA-induced thrombogenicity and endothelial injury.JCI insight · 2023Article
- An appraisal of studies using mouse models to assist the biomarker discovery for sepsis prognosis.Heliyon · 2023Review
- Advances in Rodent Experimental Models of Sepsis.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- The critical role of neutrophil-endothelial cell interactions in sepsis: new synergistic approaches employing organ-on-chip, omics, immune cell phenotyping andFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Review
- The Multifaceted Biology of PCSK9.Endocrine reviews · 2022Review
- Small animal models of thermal injury.Methods in cell biology · 2022Review
- Recent Developments in Mouse Trauma Research Models: A Mini-Review.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Prolonged Chronic Stress and Persistent Iron Dysregulation Prevent Anemia Recovery Following Trauma.The Journal of surgical research · 2021Article
- Emerging Approaches to Understanding Microvascular Endothelial Heterogeneity: A Roadmap for Developing Anti-Inflammatory Therapeutics.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- The Effects of Biological Sex on Sepsis Treatments in Animal Models: A Systematic Review and a Narrative Elaboration on Sex- and Gender-Dependent Differences in Sepsis.Critical care explorations · 2021Review
13 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Recent comparisons of the murine and human transcriptome in health and disease have called into question the appropriateness of the use of murine models for human sepsis and trauma research. More specifically, researchers have debated the suitability of mouse models of severe inflammation that is intended for eventual translation to human patients. This mini-review outlines this recent research, as well as specifically defines the arguments for and against murine models of sepsis and trauma research based on these transcriptional studies. In addition, we review newer advancements in murine models of infection and injury and define what we envision as an evolving but viable future for murine studies of sepsis and trauma.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.