Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26033863›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2015

Developments in our understanding of the genetic basis of birth defects.

Daniel M Webber, Stewart L MacLeod, Michael J Bamshad, Gary M Shaw, Richard H Finnell, Sanjay S Shete, John S Witte, Stephen W Erickson, Linda D Murphy, Charlotte Hobbs

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Mutational Assessment inInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Zebrafish models of fetal alcohol spectrum disorders.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2021
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Daniel M WebberDivision of Birth Defects Research, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Stewart L MacLeodDivision of Birth Defects Research, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Michael J BamshadDivision of Genetic Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Gary M ShawStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Richard H FinnellDell Pediatric Research Institute, Department of Nutritional Sciences, The University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas.
Sanjay S SheteDepartment of Epidemiology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
John S WitteDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Stephen W EricksonDepartment of Biostatistics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Linda D MurphyDivision of Birth Defects Research, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Charlotte HobbsDivision of Birth Defects Research, Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.

Funding

Tumor Evolution and Metastasis ProgramP30CA016672 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF TX MD ANDERSON CAN CTR · PI Fabien Delerue · 1985 to 2026
$290.8M
Genomic/Epigenomic Factors and Non-Syndromic Congenital Heart Defect Risk R01HD039054 · NICHD · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · PI HOBBS, CHARLOTTE A · 2000 to 2016
$13.6M
Centers for Birth Defects Research and Prevention (CBDRPs)U01DD000491 · DD · ARKANSAS CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL RES INST · PI HOBBS, CHARLOTTE A · 2009 to 2013
$4.3M
NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD000491NCBDD CDC HHS U01DD000491-05NICHD NIH HHS 5R01HD039054-12NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD039054
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Birth defects are a major cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. There has been much progress in understanding the genetic basis of familial and syndromic forms of birth defects. However, the etiology of nonsydromic birth defects is not well-understood. Although there is still much work to be done, we have many of the tools needed to accomplish the task. Advances in next-generation sequencing have introduced a sea of possibilities, from disease-gene discovery to clinical screening and diagnosis. These advances have been fruitful in identifying a host of candidate disease genes, spanning the spectrum of birth defects. With the advent of CRISPR-Cas9 gene editing, researchers now have a precise tool for characterizing this genetic variation in model systems. Work in model organisms has also illustrated the importance of epigenetics in human development and birth defects etiology. Here we review past and current knowledge in birth defects genetics. We describe genotyping and sequencing methods for the detection and analysis of rare and common variants. We remark on the utility of model organisms and explore epigenetics in the context of structural malformation. We conclude by highlighting approaches that may provide insight into the complex genetics of birth defects.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseGenome-Wide Association StudyCongenital AbnormalitiesGenetic VariationHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansGenetic MarkersBirth defectscleft lip and palatecongenital heart defectsepigeneticsgeneticshypospadiasneural tube defectsnext-generation sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26033863
PMCPMC4537658

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.