Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26033852›Full record

ReviewBirth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology2015

The National Birth Defects Prevention Study: A review of the methods.

Jennita Reefhuis, Suzanne M Gilboa, Marlene Anderka, Marilyn L Browne, Marcia L Feldkamp, Charlotte A Hobbs, Mary M Jenkins, Peter H Langlois, Kimberly B Newsome, Andrew F Olshan and 6 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Birth defects research. Part A, Clinical and molecular teratology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 173 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
173citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

173 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Maternal Smoking and Preterm Birth Among Infants With Orofacial Clefts.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  3. Registered Prevalence and Regional Characteristics of Congenital Anomalies in the Turkistan Region.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026
    Article
  4. Cannabis use, preterm birth, and small for gestational age: findings from the national birth defects prevention study.Journal of perinatology : official journal of the California Perinatal Association · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

113 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Jennita ReefhuisNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Suzanne M GilboaNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Marlene AnderkaMassachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts.
Marilyn L BrowneNew York State Department of Health, Albany, New York.
Marcia L FeldkampUniversity of Utah School of Medicine, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Charlotte A HobbsCollege of Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Mary M JenkinsNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Peter H LangloisTexas Department of State Health Services, Austin, Texas.
Kimberly B NewsomeNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Andrew F OlshanUniversity of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.
Paul A RomittiUniversity of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa.
Stuart K ShapiraNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Gary M ShawStanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Sarah C TinkerNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
Margaret A HoneinNational Center on Birth Defects and Developmental Disabilities, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia.
National Birth Defects Prevention Study

Funding

UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CLINICAL NUTRITION RESEARCH UNITP30DK056350 · NIDDK · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI SUSAN M. SMITH · 1999 to 2026
$31.6M
Research Services CoreP2CHD050924 · NICHD · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI KAREN B GUZZO · 2015 to 2026
$9.6M
Intramural CDC HHS CC999999NCBDD CDC HHS U01 DD001035NICHD NIH HHS P2C HD050924NIDDK NIH HHS DK56350NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056350
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe National Birth Defects Prevention Study (NBDPS) is a large population-based multicenter case-control study of major birth defects in the United States.

methodsData collection took place from 1998 through 2013 on pregnancies ending between October 1997 and December 2011. Cases could be live born, stillborn, or induced terminations, and were identified from birth defects surveillance programs in Arkansas, California, Georgia, Iowa, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Texas, and Utah. Controls were live born infants without major birth defects identified from the same geographical regions and time periods as cases by means of either vital records or birth hospitals. Computer-assisted telephone interviews were completed with women between 6 weeks and 24 months after the estimated date of delivery. After completion of interviews, families received buccal cell collection kits for the mother, father, and infant (if living).

resultsThere were 47,832 eligible cases and 18,272 eligible controls. Among these, 32,187 (67%) and 11,814 (65%), respectively, provided interview information about their pregnancies. Buccal cell collection kits with a cytobrush for at least one family member were returned by 19,065 case and 6,211 control families (65% and 59% of those who were sent a kit). More than 500 projects have been proposed by the collaborators and over 200 manuscripts published using data from the NBDPS through December 2014.

conclusionThe NBDPS has made substantial contributions to the field of birth defects epidemiology through its rigorous design, including case classification, detailed questionnaire and specimen collection, large study population, and collaborative activities across Centers.

Indexed as

Genetic MarkersCongenital AbnormalitiesData CollectionFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansInfant, NewbornNeonatal ScreeningPopulation SurveillanceUnited StatesGenetic Markersbirth defectscase-controlcongenital anomaliesepidemiologygeneticsmethodspregnancy

Identifiers

PMID26033852
PMCPMC4558899

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.