Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26033477›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2015

Indirect activation elicits strong correlations between light and electrical responses in ON but not OFF retinal ganglion cells.

Maesoon Im, Shelley I Fried

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Implications of Neural Plasticity in Retinal Prosthesis.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ultrasound stimulation for non-invasive visual prostheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Artificial Visual Information Produced by Retinal Prostheses.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2022
    Review
  17. Selective Activation of Retinal Ganglion Cell Subtypes Through Targeted Electrical Stimulation Parameters.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2022
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Spiking Characteristics of Network-Mediated Responses Arising in Direction-Selective Ganglion Cells of Rabbit and Mouse Retinas to Electric Stimulation for Retinal Prostheses.IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maesoon ImVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.
Shelley I FriedVeterans Affairs Boston Healthcare System, 150 South Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA, 02130, USA.

Funding

The mechanism by which electric stimulation activates retinal neuronsR01EY019967 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
HRS targeting of ON and OFF ganglion cellsR01EY023651 · NEI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2013 to 2016
$1.4M
Towards improved efficacy of retinal prostheticsI01RX001663 · VA · VA BOSTON HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI FRIED, SHELLEY · 2015 to 2017
–
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY019967NEI NIH HHS R01EY019967NEI NIH HHS R01 EY023651NEI NIH HHS R01EY023651RRD VA I01 RX001663
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key pointsTo improve the quality of vision elicited by retinal prosthetics, elicited neural activity should resemble physiological signalling patterns; here, we hypothesized that electric stimulation that activates the synaptic circuitry of the retina would lead to closer matches than that which activates ganglion cells directly. We evaluated this hypothesis by comparing light and electrical responses in different types of ganglion cells. In contrast to the similarity in their light responses, electrical responses in ON and OFF cells of the same type were quite distinct. Further, electrical and light responses in the same cell were much better correlated in ON vs. OFF ganglion cells. Stimuli that activated photoreceptors yielded better correlations than those which activated bipolar cells. Our results suggest that the closer match to physiology in the ON signal transmitted to the brain may help to explain preferential reports of 'bright' phosphenes during earlier clinical trials. ABSTRACT: To improve the efficacy of microelectronic retinal prosthetics it will be necessary to better understand the response of retinal neurons to electric stimulation. While stimulation that directly activates ganglion cells generally has the lowest threshold, the similarity in responsiveness across cells makes it extremely difficult for such an approach to re-create cell-type specific patterns of neural activity that arise normally in the healthy retina. In contrast, stimulation that activates neurons presynaptic to ganglion cells utilizes at least some of the existing retinal circuitry and therefore is thought to produce neural activity that better matches physiological signalling. Surprisingly, the actual benefit(s) of this approach remain unsubstantiated. Here, we recorded from ganglion cells in the rabbit retinal explant in response to electrical stimuli that activated the network. Targeted cells were first classified into known types via light responses so that the consistency of electrical responses within individual types could be evaluated. Both transient and sustained ON ganglion cells exhibited highly consistent electrical response patterns which were distinct from one another. Further, properties of the response (interspike interval, latency, peak firing rate, and spike count) in a given cell were well correlated to the corresponding properties of the light response for that same cell. Electric responses in OFF ganglion cells formed two groups, distinct from ON groups, and the correlation levels between electric and light responses were much weaker. The closer match in ON pathway responses may help to explain some preferential reporting of bright stimuli during psychophysical testing.

Indexed as

AnimalsElectric StimulationIn Vitro TechniquesPhotic StimulationRabbitsRetinal Ganglion Cells

Identifiers

PMID26033477
PMCPMC4560585

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.