Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26033428›Full record

Trial reportClinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico2015

A phase II study of feasibility and toxicity of bevacizumab in combination with temozolomide in patients with recurrent glioblastoma.

J M Sepúlveda, C Belda-Iniesta, M Gil-Gil, P Pérez-Segura, A Berrocal, G Reynés, O Gallego, J Capellades, J M Ordoñez, B La Orden and 1 more

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase II
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Clinical outcomes in recurrent glioblastoma with bevacizumab therapy: An analysis of the literature.Journal of clinical neuroscience : official journal of the Neurosurgical Society of Australasia · 2017
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 10 institutions in 2 countries.

J M SepúlvedaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
C Belda-Iniesta
M Gil-Gil
P Pérez-Segura
A Berrocal
G Reynés
O Gallego
J Capellades
J M Ordoñez
B La Orden
C Balañá
Institut Català d'Oncologia · ESHospital Clínico San Carlos · ESHospital Del Mar · ESHospital de Sant Pau · ESHospital General Universitario De Valencia · ESHospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESHospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro · ESRoche (Bosnia-Herzegovina) · BARoche (Spain) · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe aim of this prospective and multicentric phase II study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of temozolomide (TMZ) and bevacizumab (BV) in patients (pts) with recurrent glioblastoma (GB), previously treated with chemoradiotherapy and at least three cycles of adjuvant TMZ. PATIENTS AND

methodsPatients with GB at first relapse received BV 10 mg/kg day every 2 weeks and TMZ 150 mg/m(2) days 1-7 and 15-21, every 28 days. Patients underwent brain magnetic resonance imaging every 8 weeks.

resultsThirty-two evaluable pts were recruited in 8 sites. Fourteen pts (44%) had gross total resection. O(6)-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) promoter was methylated in 12 pts, unmethylated in 6 pts, and missing in 14 pts. The estimated 6-month progression free survival (PFS) rate was 21.9% (95% CI 9.3-40.0%). The median PFS and overall survival (OS) were 4.2 months (95% CI 3.6-5.4 months) and 7.3 months (95% CI 5.8-8.8 months), respectively. No significant association with MGMT status was found in terms of OS or PFS. Six of 32 pts (19%; 95% CI 7.2-36.4) were long-term survivors, with a median PFS and OS (50% events) of 9.5 months (95% CI 7.9-23.6) and 15.4 (95% CI 8.9-NA), respectively: no differences in baseline characteristics were identified in comparison with total population. No unexpected toxicities or treatment-related deaths were observed.

conclusionsThis regimen showed to be feasible and well tolerated in pts with recurrent GB pretreated with TMZ. Further investigation is warranted to identify subpopulations that are more likely to benefit from addition of BV to GB therapy.

Indexed as

Hematologic DiseasesAdultAgedAntineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsBevacizumabBrain NeoplasmsDacarbazineFeasibility StudiesFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNeoplasm StagingBevacizumabDacarbazineTemozolomide

Identifiers

PMID26033428
OpenAlexW566773017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.