Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26033279›Full record

ArticleBiology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation2015

Tbo-Filgrastim versus Filgrastim during Mobilization and Neutrophil Engraftment for Autologous Stem Cell Transplantation.

Mohammed M Elayan, Justin G Horowitz, Jose M Magraner, Paul J Shaughnessy, Carlos Bachier

Open access · hybridAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of blood and marrow transplantation : journal of the American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Extrapolation in Practice: Lessons from 10 Years with Biosimilar Filgrastim.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2019
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Mohammed M ElayanAdult Blood and Marrow Transplant, Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas. Electronic address: mohammed.elayan@mhshealth.com.
Justin G HorowitzAdult Blood and Marrow Transplant, Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas; University of Texas College of Pharmacy, Austin, Texas.
Jose M MagranerAdult Blood and Marrow Transplant, Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas.
Paul J ShaughnessyAdult Blood and Marrow Transplant, Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas; Sarah Cannon Blood Cancer Network, Nashville, Tennessee.
Carlos BachierAdult Blood and Marrow Transplant, Texas Transplant Institute, San Antonio, Texas; Sarah Cannon Blood Cancer Network, Nashville, Tennessee.
CHRISTUS Transplant Institute · USSarah Cannon · USAustin College · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

There are limited data available supporting the use of the recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF), tbo-filgrastim, rather than traditionally used filgrastim to mobilize peripheral blood stem cells (PBSC) or to accelerate engraftment after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). We sought to compare the efficacy and cost of tbo-filgrastim to filgrastim in these settings. Patients diagnosed with lymphoma or plasma cell disorders undergoing G-CSF mobilization, with or without plerixafor, were included in this retrospective analysis. The primary outcome was total collected CD34(+) cells/kg. Secondary mobilization endpoints included peripheral CD34(+) cells/μL on days 4 and 5 of mobilization, adjunctive use of plerixafor, CD34(+) cells/kg collected on day 5, number of collection days and volumes processed, number of collections reaching 5 million CD34(+) cells/kg, and percent reaching target collection goal in 1 day. Secondary engraftment endpoints included time to neutrophil and platelet engraftment, number of blood product transfusions required before engraftment, events of febrile neutropenia, and length of stay. A total of 185 patients were included in the final analysis. Patients receiving filgrastim (n = 86) collected a median of 5.56 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg, compared with a median of 5.85 × 10(6) CD34(+) cells/kg in the tbo-filgrastim group (n = 99; P = .58). There were no statistically significant differences in all secondary endpoints with the exception of apheresis volumes processed (tbo-filgrastim, 17.0 liters versus filgrastim, 19.7 liters; P < .01) and mean platelet transfusions (tbo-filgrastim, 1.7 units versus filgrastim, 1.4 units; P = .04). In conclusion, tbo-filgrastim demonstrated similar CD34(+) yield compared with filgrastim in mobilization and post-transplantation settings, with no clinically meaningful differences in secondary efficacy and safety endpoints. Furthermore, tbo-filgrastim utilization was associated with cost savings of approximately $1406 per patient utilizing average wholesale price.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationAdultAgedAntigens, CD34BenzylaminesBlood PlateletsCost-Benefit AnalysisCyclamsFemaleFilgrastimGraft SurvivalHematopoietic Stem Cell MobilizationHeterocyclic CompoundsHumansLength of StayLymphoma, B-CellAntigens, CD34BenzylaminesCyclamsFilgrastimHeterocyclic CompoundsplerixaforBiosimilarEngraftmentGranulocyte colony–stimulating factorMobilizationTbo-filgrastim

Identifiers

PMID26033279
OpenAlexW2154836716

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.