Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26033081›Full record

ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine2015

Genetic modifiers and oligogenic inheritance.

Maria Kousi, Nicholas Katsanis

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 71 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
71citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

71 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Benchmark of computational methods to detect digenism in sequencing data.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. HMCN1 variants aggravate epidermolysis bullosa simplex phenotype.The Journal of experimental medicine · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

11 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Maria KousiCenter for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710.
Nicholas KatsanisCenter for Human Disease Modeling, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina 27710.

Funding

Molecular Genetics of BBSR01HD042601 · NICHD · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI DAVIS, ERICA ELLEN · 2003 to 2023
$8.2M
Genetic and Functional Studies of Human Ciliary SyndromesR01DK072301 · NIDDK · LURIE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF CHICAGO · PI DAVIS, ERICA ELLEN · 2005 to 2022
$7.2M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD042601NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK072301
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite remarkable progress in the identification of mutations that drive genetic disorders, progress in understanding the effect of genetic background on the penetrance and expressivity of causal alleles has been modest, in part because of the methodological challenges in identifying genetic modifiers. Nonetheless, the progressive discovery of modifier alleles has improved both our interpretative ability and our analytical tools to dissect such phenomena. In this review, we analyze the genetic properties and behaviors of modifiers as derived from studies in patient populations and model organisms and we highlight conceptual and technological tools used to overcome some of the challenges inherent in modifier mapping and cloning. Finally, we discuss how the identification of these modifiers has facilitated the elucidation of biological pathways and holds the potential to improve the clinical predictive value of primary causal mutations and to develop novel drug targets.

Indexed as

AllelesAnimalsCloning, MolecularForecastingGenes, ModifierHumansMiceMice, Inbred StrainsModels, GeneticMultifactorial InheritanceMutationPenetrancePhenotypeRetinal Degeneration

Identifiers

PMID26033081
PMCPMC4448705

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.