Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26032983›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2015

Toward smart implant synthesis: bonding bioceramics of different resorbability to match bone growth rates.

Rafael Comesaña, Fernando Lusquiños, Jesús Del Val, Félix Quintero, Antonio Riveiro, Mohamed Boutinguiza, Julian R Jones, Robert G Hill, Juan Pou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Three-Dimensional Scaffolds for Bone Tissue Engineering.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Advances in Growth Factor Delivery for Bone Tissue Engineering.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  8. 3D Printing for Bone Regeneration.Current osteoporosis reports · 2020
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Rafael ComesañaApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
Fernando LusquiñosApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
Jesús Del ValApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
Félix QuinteroApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
Antonio RiveiroApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
Mohamed BoutinguizaApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.
Julian R JonesDepartment of Materials, Imperial College London, South Kensington Campus, London SW7 2AZ, United Kingdom.
Robert G HillUnit of Dental and Physical Sciences, Barts and the London, Mile End Road, London E1 4NS, United Kingdom.
Juan PouApplied Physics Dpt., University of Vigo, E.I.I., Lagoas-Marcosende E-36310, Vigo, Spain.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Craniofacial reconstructive surgery requires a bioactive bone implant capable to provide a gradual resorbability and to adjust to the kinetics of new bone formation during healing. Biomaterials made of calcium phosphate or bioactive glasses are currently available, mainly as bone defect fillers, but it is still required a versatile processing technique to fabricate composition-gradient bioceramics for application as controlled resorption implants. Here it is reported the application of rapid prototyping based on laser cladding to produce three-dimensional bioceramic implants comprising of a calcium phosphate inner core, with moderate in vitro degradation at physiological pH, surrounded by a bioactive glass outer layer of higher degradability. Each component of the implant is validated in terms of chemical and physical properties, and absence of toxicity. Pre-osteoblastic cell adhesion and proliferation assays reveal the adherence and growth of new bone cells on the material. This technique affords implants with gradual-resorbability for restoration of low-load-bearing bone.

Indexed as

Bone SubstitutesCeramicsProstheses and ImplantsCalcium PhosphatesGlassLasersMaterials TestingReproducibility of ResultsBone Substitutescalcium phosphateCalcium Phosphates

Identifiers

PMID26032983
PMCPMC4451530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.