ReviewCold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology2015
The evolution of sexually antagonistic phenotypes.
Review in Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
23 citing papers in PubMed.
- A novel female reproductive organ differentiates insemination and postmating responses in bedbugs.Molecular biology and evolution · 2026Article
- Alternative mating tactics in brown widow spiders: mating with or without male self-sacrifice does not affect the copulatory mechanism.Frontiers in zoology · 2025Article
- Sexually antagonistic coevolution of the male nuptial gift and female feeding behaviour in decorated crickets.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2024Article
- Fertility signalling games: should males obey the signal?Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Increased male-induced harm in response to female-limited selection: interactive effects between intra- and interlocus sexual conflict?Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2023Article
- Male harm offsets the demographic benefits of good genes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023Article
- Article
- Concerted evolution of metabolic rate, economics of mating, ecology, and pace of life across seed beetles.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2022Article
- The evolution of sex peptide: sexual conflict, cooperation, and coevolution.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2022Article
- A reexamination of theoretical arguments that indirect selection on mate preference is likely to be weaker than direct selection.Evolution letters · 2022Article
- Evolution of nuptial gifts and its coevolutionary dynamics with male-like persistence traits of females for multiple mating.BMC ecology and evolution · 2021Article
- Run or Die in the Evolution of New MicroRNAs-Testing the Red Queen Hypothesis on De Novo New Genes.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Sex ratio and the evolution of aggression in fruit flies.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2021Article
- Differences in Postmating Transcriptional Responses between Conspecific and Heterospecific Matings in Drosophila.Molecular biology and evolution · 2021Article
- Male coercion and female injury in a sexually cannibalistic mantis.Biology letters · 2021Article
- Sexual conflict and intrasexual polymorphism promote assortative mating and halt population differentiation.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2019Article
- Evolution of female choice under intralocus sexual conflict and genotype-by-environment interactions.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Sexual conflict in its ecological setting.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Divergence in sex peptide-mediated female post-mating responses inProceedings. Biological sciences · 2018Article
- Rapid Gene Family Evolution of a Nematode Sperm Protein Despite Sequence Hyper-conservation.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Sexual conflict occurs whenever there is sexually antagonistic selection on shared traits. When shared traits result from interactions (e.g., mating rate) and have a different genetic basis in each sex (i.e., interlocus conflict), then sex-specific traits that shift the value of these interaction traits toward the sex-specific optimum will be favored. Male traits can be favored that increase the fitness of their male bearers, but decrease the fitness of interacting females. Likewise, female traits that reduce the costs of interacting with harmful males may simultaneously impose costs on males. If the evolution of these antagonistic traits changes the nature of selection acting on the opposite sex, interesting coevolutionary dynamics will result. Here we examine three current issues in the study of sexually antagonistic interactions: the female side of sexual conflict, the ecological context of sexual conflict, and the strength of evidence for sexually antagonistic coevolution.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.