Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26031746›Full record

ArticleTropical medicine & international health : TM & IH2015

Roles and responsibilities in newborn care in four African sites.

R Iganus, Z Hill, F Manzi, M Bee, Y Amare, D Shamba, A Odebiyi, E Adejuyigbe, B Omotara, J Skordis-Worrall

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Tropical medicine & international health : TM & IH, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. "Ethiopian journal of health sciences · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. BMJ open · 2019
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 7 institutions in 4 countries.

R IganusDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
Z HillInstitute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
F ManziIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
M BeeInstitute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
Y AmareConsultancy for Social Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
D ShambaIfakara Health Institute, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.
A OdebiyiPost-Graduate School, Lead City University, Ibadan, Nigeria.
E AdejuyigbeFaculty of Clinical Sciences, College of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Ile-ife, Nigeria.
B OmotaraDepartment of Community Medicine, College of Medical Sciences, University of Maiduguri, Maiduguri, Nigeria.
J Skordis-WorrallInstitute of Global Health, University College London, London, UK.
George Institute for Global Health · GBIfakara Health Institute · TZUniversity of Maiduguri · NGAddis Ababa University · ETLead City University · NGObafemi Awolowo University · NGUniversity College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo explore roles and responsibilities in newborn care in the intra- and postpartum period in Nigeria, Tanzania and Ethiopia.

methodsQualitative data were collected using in-depth interviews with mothers, grandmothers, fathers, health workers and birth attendants and were analysed through content and framework analyses.

resultsWe found that birth attendants were the main decision-makers and care takers in the intrapartum period. Birth attendants varied across sites and included female relatives (Ethiopia and Nigeria), traditional birth attendants (Tanzania and Nigeria), spiritual birth attendants (Nigeria) and health workers (Tanzania and Nigeria). In the early newborn period, when the mother is deemed to be resting, female family members assumed this role. The mothers themselves only took full responsibility for newborn care after a few days or weeks. The early newborn period was protracted for first-time mothers, who were perceived as needing training on caring for the baby. Clear gender roles were described, with newborn care being considered a woman's domain. Fathers had little physical contact with the newborn, but played an important role in financing newborn care, and were considered the ultimate decision-maker in the family.

conclusionInterventions should move beyond a focus on the mother-child dyad, to include other carers who perform and decide on newborn care practices. Given this power dynamic, interventions that involve men have the potential to result in behaviour change.

Indexed as

Child Health ServicesInfant CareMidwiferyPerinatal CareDecision MakingEthiopiaFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornMaleNigeriaPregnancyQualitative ResearchTanzaniaTime FactorsWorkforceAfricaÁfricaAfriqueatención inmediata del recién nacidobehaviourcomportamientocomportementimmediate newborn careneonatalnéonatalNewbornnouveau-nésrecién nacidorolesrôlessoins immédiats du nouveau-né

Identifiers

PMID26031746
PMCPMC5008199
OpenAlexW1531464396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.