Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26031435›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging2015

PET imaging of DNA damage using (89)Zr-labelled anti-γH2AX-TAT immunoconjugates.

James C Knight, Caitríona Topping, Michael Mosley, Veerle Kersemans, Nadia Falzone, José M Fernández-Varea, Bart Cornelissen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 27 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. A Model System to Explore the Detection Limits of Antibody-Based Immuno-SPECT Imaging of Exclusively Intranuclear Epitopes.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2021
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Interest and Limits of [Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  11. Early Detection in a Mouse Model of Pancreatic Cancer by Imaging DNA Damage Response Signaling.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Article
  12. Imaging DNA Damage Repair In Vivo AfterJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2020
    Article
  13. Theranostics · 2020
    Article
  14. PET Imaging of PARP Expression UsingJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2019
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Imaging the DNA damage response with PET and SPECT.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2017
    Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

James C KnightCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.
Caitríona ToppingCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.
Michael MosleyCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.
Veerle KersemansCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.
Nadia FalzoneCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK.
José M Fernández-VareaFacultat de Fisica (ECM and ICC), Universitat de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.
Bart CornelissenCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology, Department of Oncology, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus Research Building, Off Roosevelt Drive, Oxford, OX3 7LJ, UK. bart.cornelissen@oncology.ox.ac.uk.
University of Oxford · GBCRUK/MRC Oxford Institute for Radiation Oncology · GBUniversitat de Barcelona · ES

Funding

Cancer Research UK 16466Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe efficacy of most anticancer treatments, including radiotherapy, depends on an ability to cause DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs). Very early during the DNA damage signalling process, the histone isoform H2AX is phosphorylated to form γH2AX. With the aim of positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of DSBs, we synthesized a (89)Zr-labelled anti-γH2AX antibody, modified with the cell-penetrating peptide, TAT, which includes a nuclear localization sequence.

methods(89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT was synthesized using EDC/NHS chemistry for TAT peptide linkage. Desferrioxamine conjugation allowed labelling with (89)Zr. Uptake and retention of (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT was evaluated in the breast adenocarcinoma cell line MDA-MB-468 in vitro or as xenografts in athymic mice. External beam irradiation was used to induce DSBs and expression of γH2AX. Since (89)Zr emits ionizing radiation, detailed radiobiological measurements were included to ensure (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT itself does not cause any additional DSBs.

resultsUptake of (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT was similar to previous results using (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT. Retention of (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT was eightfold higher at 1 h post irradiation, in cells expressing γH2AX, compared to non-irradiated cells or to non-specific IgG control. PET imaging of mice showed higher uptake of (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT in irradiated xenografts, compared to non-irradiated or non-specific controls (12.1 ± 1.6 vs 5.2 ± 1.9 and 5.1 ± 0.8%ID/g, respectively; p < 0.0001). The mean absorbed dose to the nucleus of cells taking up (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT was twofold lower compared to (111)In-anti-γH2AX-TAT. Additional exposure of neither irradiated nor non-irradiated cells nor tissues to (89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT resulted in any significant changes in the number of observable DNA DSBs, γH2AX foci or clonogenic survival.

conclusion(89)Zr-anti-γH2AX-TAT allows PET imaging of DNA DSBs in a tumour xenograft mouse model.

Indexed as

DNA Breaks, Double-StrandedImmunoconjugatesZirconiumAnimalsAntibodies, MonoclonalBiological TransportCell Line, TumorCell Transformation, NeoplasticFemaleGene Products, tatHistonesHumansMicePositron-Emission TomographyRadioisotopesTissue DistributionAntibodies, MonoclonalGene Products, tatHistonesImmunoconjugatesRadioisotopesZirconium

Identifiers

PMID26031435
OpenAlexW1596373974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.