Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26030914›Full record

ArticlePloS one2015

Cancer stage, comorbidity, and socioeconomic differences in the effect of cancer on labour market participation: a danish register-based follow-up study.

Karsten Thielen, Christophe Kolodziejczyk, Ingelise Andersen, Eskil Heinesen, Finn Diderichsen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
10.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Prognostic factors for return to work in breast cancer survivors.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Factors associated with return to work in breast cancer survivors treated at the Public Cancer Hospital in Brazil.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2020
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sustaining Work Participation Across the Life Course.Journal of occupational rehabilitation · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Karsten ThielenSection of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Christophe KolodziejczykKORA, Danish Institute for Local and Regional Government Research, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Ingelise AndersenSection of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Eskil HeinesenRockwool Foundation Research Unit, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
Finn DiderichsenSection of Social Medicine, Institute of Public Health, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen K, Denmark.
University of Copenhagen · DKRockwool Foundation · DK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSocioeconomic inequality in return to work after cancer treatment and rehabilitation have been documented, but less is known about its causes. This paper investigates the role played by breast cancer stage at diagnosis and comorbidity.

methodsWe used the comprehensive Danish Cancer Registry to follow 7372 women aged 30-60, who were in the labour force when diagnosed with breast cancer in 2000-06 and survived at least three years. Controls were 213,276 women without breast cancer. Inequalities in employment outlook were estimated as interaction effects in linear regression between educational attainment and disease on employment.

resultsThere is significant interaction between education and breast cancer, but it is only marginally affected by including stage and comorbidity in the regression models. Education, breast cancer stage, and comorbidity all have strong effects on later employment, and a considerable amount of the educational effect is mediated by comorbidity and pre-cancer labour market participation and income.

conclusionThe result of the study is negative in the sense that the stronger effect of breast cancer on employment among low-educated compared to highly educated individuals is not explained by cancer stage or comorbidity. The fact that comorbidity has little impact on inequality may be due to a different social patterning of most comorbidity compared to breast cancer.

Indexed as

AdultBreast NeoplasmsCase-Control StudiesComorbidityEmploymentFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansIncomeNeoplasm StagingRegistriesSocial ClassSocioeconomic Factors

Identifiers

PMID26030914
PMCPMC4451757
OpenAlexW590459544

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.