Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26030195›Full record

Observational studyPloS one2015

Use of Loop Diuretics is Associated with Increased Mortality in Patients with Suspected Coronary Artery Disease, but without Systolic Heart Failure or Renal Impairment: An Observational Study Using Propensity Score Matching.

Hall Schartum-Hansen, Kjetil H Løland, Gard F T Svingen, Reinhard Seifert, Eva R Pedersen, Jan E Nordrehaug, Øyvind Bleie, Marta Ebbing, Christ Berge, Dennis W T Nilsen and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in PloS one, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 38 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Combination diuretic therapies in heart failure: Insights from GUIDE-IT.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Impact of drugs on venous thromboembolism risk in surgical patients.European journal of clinical pharmacology · 2019
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Hall Schartum-HansenDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kjetil H LølandSection for Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Gard F T SvingenSection for Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Reinhard SeifertDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Eva R PedersenSection for Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Jan E NordrehaugSection for Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
Øyvind BleieDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Marta EbbingNorwegian Institute of Public Health, Bergen, Norway.
Christ BergeDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Dennis W T NilsenSection for Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway; Stavanger University Hospital, Stavanger, Norway.
Ottar NygårdDepartment of Heart Disease, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway; Section for Cardiology, Department of Clinical Science, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NOHaukeland University Hospital · NONorwegian Institute of Public Health · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLoop diuretics are widely used in patients with heart and renal failure, as well as to treat hypertension and peripheral edema. However, there are no randomized, controlled trials (RCT) evaluating their long term safety, and several observational reports have indicated adverse effects. We sought to evaluate the impact of loop diuretics on long term survival in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, but without clinical heart failure, reduced left ventricular ejection fraction or impaired renal function. METHOD AND

findingsFrom 3101 patients undergoing coronary angiography for suspected stable angina pectoris, subjects taking loop diuretics (n=109) were matched with controls (n=198) in an attempted 1:2 ratio, using propensity scores based on 59 baseline variables. During median follow-up of 10.1 years, 37.6% in the loop diuretics group and 23.7% in the control group died (log-rank p-value 0.005). Treatment with loop diuretics was associated with a hazard ratio (95% confidence interval) of 1.82 (1.20, 2.76), and the number needed to harm was 7.2 (4.1, 30.3). Inclusion of all 3101 patients using propensity score weighting and adjustment for numerous covariates provided similar estimates. The main limitation is the potential of confounding from unmeasured patient characteristics.

conclusionsThe use of loop diuretics in patients with suspected coronary artery disease, but without systolic heart failure or renal impairment, is associated with increased risk of all-cause mortality. Considering the lack of randomized controlled trials to evaluate long term safety of loop diuretics, our data suggest caution when prescribing these drugs to patients without a clear indication.

Indexed as

AgedCoronary Artery DiseaseFemaleHeart Failure, SystolicHumansMaleMiddle AgedObservational Studies as TopicRenal InsufficiencySodium Potassium Chloride Symporter InhibitorsSodium Potassium Chloride Symporter Inhibitors

Identifiers

PMID26030195
PMCPMC4452510
OpenAlexW1517917949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.