Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26030186›Full record

ReviewIslets2015

Structural similarities and differences between the human and the mouse pancreas.

Jurij Dolenšek, Marjan Slak Rupnik, Andraž Stožer

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Islets, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 193 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
193citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

193 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Non-specific uptake ofScientific reports · 2024
    Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

133 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jurij Dolenšeka Institute of Physiology; Faculty of Medicine; University of Maribor ; Maribor , Slovenia.
Marjan Slak Rupnik
Andraž Stožer

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mice remain the most studied animal model in pancreas research. Since the findings of this research are typically extrapolated to humans, it is important to understand both similarities and differences between the 2 species. Beside the apparent difference in size and macroscopic organization of the organ in the 2 species, there are a number of less evident and only recently described differences in organization of the acinar and ductal exocrine tissue, as well as in the distribution, composition, and architecture of the endocrine islets of Langerhans. Furthermore, the differences in arterial, venous, and lymphatic vessels, as well as innervation are potentially important. In this article, the structure of the human and the mouse pancreas, together with the similarities and differences between them are reviewed in detail in the light of conceivable repercussions for basic research and clinical application.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease Models, AnimalHumansInsulin-Secreting CellsIslets of LangerhansMicePancreasanatomyendocrineexocrinehuman pancreasinnervationislet of Langerhansmouse pancreasstructurevasculature

Identifiers

PMID26030186
PMCPMC4589993

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.