Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26030052›Full record

Observational studyBone marrow transplantation2015

Conditioning intensity in middle-aged patients with AML in first CR: no advantage for myeloablative regimens irrespective of the risk group-an observational analysis by the Acute Leukemia Working Party of the EBMT.

J R Passweg, M Labopin, J Cornelissen, L Volin, G Socié, A Huynh, R Tabrizi, D Wu, C Craddock, N Schaap and 12 more

Open access · greenAbstract readMulticenter StudyObservational Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Observational study in Bone marrow transplantation, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Treatment of AML Relapse After Allo-HCT.Frontiers in oncology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors at 20 institutions in 12 countries.

J R PasswegDivision of Hematology, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
M LabopinEBMT Paris Study Office, Paris, France.
J CornelissenErasmus MC-Daniel den Hoed Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
L VolinStem Cell Transplantation Unit, Comprehensive Cancer Center, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland.
G SociéDivision of Hematology, Hospital St Louis & University Paris, Paris, France.
A HuynhCHU Department Hematologie, Hopital de Purpan, Toulouse, France.
R TabriziCHU Bordeaux, Hôpital Haut-leveque, Pessac, France.
D WuDepartment of Hematology, First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Suzhou, China.
C CraddockCentre for Clinical Haematology, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Birmingham, UK.
N SchaapDepartment of Hematology, Nijmegen Medical Centre, Radboud University, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
J KuballDepartment of Hematology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
P ChevallierDepartment D'Hematologie, CHU Nantes, Nantes, France.
J Y CahnClinique Universitaire d'Hématologie CHU Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
D BlaiseDépartement D'Onco-Hématologie, Institut Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France.
A GhavamzadehHematology-Oncology and BMT Research, Shariati Hospital, Teheran, Iran.
K BilgerCHU Hautepierre-Service d'Onco Hematologie, Strasbourg, France.
F CiceriOspedale San Raffaele, Milano, Italy.
C SchmidMedizinische Klinik II, Klinikum Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany.
S GiebelDepartment of Bone Marrow Transplantation and Hematology-Oncology, Maria Sklodowska-Curie Memorial Cancer Center, Gliwice, Poland.
A NaglerHematology Division, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel-Hashomer, Israel.
M MohtyDepartment of Hematology, Hospital Saint Antoine, Paris, France.
Acute Leukemia Working Party of the European Blood and Marrow Transplant Group (EBMT)
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLEuropean Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation · FRFirst Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University · CNHelsinki University Hospital · FIHôpital Cardiologique du Haut-Lévêque · FRHôpital d'Hautepierre · FRHôpital Purpan · FRHôpital Saint-Antoine · FRHôpital Saint-Louis · FRInstitut Paoli-Calmettes · FRIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · ITNantes Université · FRQueen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham · GBRadboud University Nijmegen · NLSheba Medical Center · ILTehran University of Medical Sciences · IRThe Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology · PLUniversity Hospital Augsburg · DEUniversity Hospital of Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recipients of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation with AML in CR1, reduced intensity (RIC) conditioning regimens are usually given to older patients and myeloablative regimens (MAC) to younger patients. We analyzed whether in middle-aged patients aged 40-60 years, MAC was superior to RIC in cytogenetically higher risk AML. Among 2974 patients, 1638 had MAC and 1336 RIC transplants. Cytogenetics were high risk in 508, intermediate risk in 2297 and low risk in 169. Overall survival (OS) was higher in patients with RIC with low-risk cytogenetics but not in the intermediate- or poor-risk AML. Relapse incidence was lower with MAC in poor- and intermediate-risk AML. Nonrelapse mortality (NRM) was higher in MAC in all cytogenetic risk groups. Multivariate analysis confirmed a significant leukemia-free survival and OS advantage for RIC in low risk but no advantage of MAC in intermediate- and poor-risk leukemia. In patients aged 40-60 years, MAC has no advantage over RIC. We confirm lower relapse but higher NRM risks with MAC. MAC is not superior in patients with higher risk cytogenetics, but is inferior to RIC in the small cohort of AML patients with low-risk cytogenetics.

Indexed as

Hematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteTransplantation ConditioningAdultAllograftsDisease-Free SurvivalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk FactorsSurvival Rate

Identifiers

PMID26030052
OpenAlexW1497472859

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.