Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029928›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2015

Leprosy Reactions in Patients Coinfected with HIV: Clinical Aspects and Outcomes in Two Comparative Cohorts in the Amazon Region, Brazil.

Carla Andréa Avelar Pires, Fernando Octávio Machado Jucá Neto, Nahima Castelo de Albuquerque, Geraldo Mariano Moraes Macedo, Keila de Nazaré Madureira Batista, Marília Brasil Xavier

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Peripheral nerve abnormality in HIV leprosy patients.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2018
    Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Carla Andréa Avelar PiresDepartment of Dermatology, Division of Tropical Skin Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil; Department of Dermatology, Division of Tropical Skin Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Fernando Octávio Machado Jucá NetoDepartment of Dermatology, Division of Tropical Skin Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Nahima Castelo de AlbuquerqueDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Division of Tropical Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Geraldo Mariano Moraes MacedoDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Division of Tropical Diseases, Section of Epidemiological Vigilance, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Keila de Nazaré Madureira BatistaDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Division of Tropical Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.
Marília Brasil XavierDepartment of Dermatology, Division of Tropical Skin Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil; Department of Dermatology, Division of Tropical Skin Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade do Estado do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil; Department of Infectious Diseases, Division of Tropical Diseases, Section of Leprosy, Universidade Federal do Pará, Belém, Pará, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundLeprosy, caused by Mycobacterium leprae, can lead to scarring and deformities. Human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), a lymphotropic virus with high rates of replication, leads to cell death in various stages of infection. These diseases have major social and quality of life costs, and although the relevance of their comorbidity is recognized, several aspects are still not fully understood. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsTwo cohorts of patients with leprosy in an endemic region of the Amazon were observed. We compared 40 patients with leprosy and HIV (Group 1) and 107 leprosy patients with no comorbidity (Group 2) for a minimum of 2 years. Group 1 predominantly experienced the paucibacillary classification, accounting for 70% of cases, whereas Group 2 primarily experienced the multibacillary classification (80.4% of cases). There was no significant difference in the prevalence of leprosy reactions among the two groups (37.5% for Group 1 vs. 56.1% for Group 2), and the most frequent reaction was Type 1. The appearance of Group 1 patients' reversal reaction skin lesions was consistent with each clinical form: typically erythematous and infiltrated, with similar progression as those patients without HIV, which responded to prednisone. Patients in both groups primarily experienced a single episode (73.3% in Group 1 and 75% in Group 2), and Group 1 had shorter reaction periods (≤3 months; 93.3%), moderate severity (80%), with 93.3% of the patients in the state of acquired immune deficiency syndrome, and 46.7% presenting the reaction at the time of the immune reconstitution inflammatory syndrome. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study used a large sample and makes a significant contribution to the clinical outcomes of patients in the reactive state with comorbid HIV and leprosy. The data indicate that these diseases, although concurrent, have independent courses.

Indexed as

BrazilCohort StudiesCoinfectionHIV InfectionsHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeprosy, MultibacillaryLeprosy, PaucibacillaryLongitudinal StudiesPrevalence

Identifiers

PMID26029928
PMCPMC4451982

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.