Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029902›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of health policy and management2015

Untimely applause was a distraction. Comment on "Shanghai rising: health improvements as measured by avoidable mortality since 2000".

Fei Yan, Jian Zhang

Abstract readComment
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of health policy and management, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Cities and Health: A Response to the Recent Commentaries.International journal of health policy and management · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Fei YanDepartment of Social Medicine, School of Public Health, Fudan University, Shanghai, China.
Jian ZhangJiann-Ping Hsu College of Public Health, Georgia Southern University, Statesboro, GA, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper published in the January 2015 issue of this journal by Gusmano and colleagues entitled "Shanghai rising: health improvements as measured by avoidable mortality since 2000" has spurred this commentary. We discuss controversial issues surrounding the concept of avoidable mortality in health service research in general and Gusmano's study in particular. The impact of overall social development on mortality may be underappreciated in Gusmano's report; the innovative efforts of healthcare professionals to use cutting-edge technology and evidence-approved preventive strategies to reduce healthcare cost and improve the life quality of community members may not necessarily come to fruition in death reduction, and might be undervalued, too. More critically, the shape and magnitude of emerging health issues in Shanghai, such as accidents and injuries, pollution-related cancers, may be camouflaged in Gusmano's report. We conclude this commentary by suggesting the most urgent questions to be addressed in the future studies.

Indexed as

Avoidable MortalityChinaGlobal HealthPerformanceShanghai

Identifiers

PMID26029902
PMCPMC4450738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.