Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029670›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology2015

Stenotrophomonas maltophilia responds to exogenous AHL signals through the LuxR solo SmoR (Smlt1839).

Paula Martínez, Pol Huedo, Sònia Martinez-Servat, Raquel Planell, Mario Ferrer-Navarro, Xavier Daura, Daniel Yero, Isidre Gibert

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular Regulation of Biofilm Development inPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  2. A quorum-sensing molecule fromProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. The Mla system and its role in maintaining outer membrane barrier function inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2024
    Article
  5. Frontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Comparative genomics analysis ofFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023
    Article
  10. Clinical challenges treatingJAC-antimicrobial resistance · 2022
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Comparative genomic and functional analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Genes · 2021
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. The complete genome sequence of the algicidal bacteriumBiotechnology reports (Amsterdam, Netherlands) · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Paula MartínezGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Pol HuedoGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Sònia Martinez-ServatGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Raquel PlanellGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Mario Ferrer-NavarroGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Xavier DauraGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Catalan Institution for Research and Advanced Studies Barcelona, Spain.
Daniel YeroGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Isidre GibertGrup de Genètica Molecular i Patogènesi Bacteriana, Institut de Biotecnologia i de Biomedicina, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain ; Departament de Genètica i de Microbiologia, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona Barcelona, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quorum Sensing (QS) mediated by Acyl Homoserine Lactone (AHL) molecules are probably the most widespread and studied among Gram-negative bacteria. Canonical AHL systems are composed by a synthase (LuxI family) and a regulator element (LuxR family), whose genes are usually adjacent in the genome. However, incomplete AHL-QS machinery lacking the synthase LuxI is frequently observed in Proteobacteria, and the regulator element is then referred as LuxR solo. It has been shown that certain LuxR solos participate in interspecific communication by detecting signals produced by different organisms. In the case of Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, a preliminary genome sequence analysis revealed numerous putative luxR genes, none of them associated to a luxI gene. From these, the hypothetical LuxR solo Smlt1839, here designated SmoR, presents a conserved AHL binding domain and a helix-turn-helix DNA binding motif. Its genomic organization-adjacent to hchA gene-indicate that SmoR belongs to the new family "LuxR regulator chaperone HchA-associated." AHL-binding assays revealed that SmoR binds to AHLs in-vitro, at least to oxo-C8-homoserine lactone, and it regulates operon transcription, likely by recognizing a conserved palindromic regulatory box in the hchA upstream region. Supplementation with concentrated supernatants from Pseudomonas aeruginosa, which contain significant amounts of AHLs, promoted swarming motility in S. maltophilia. Contrarily, no swarming stimulation was observed when the P. aeruginosa supernatant was treated with the lactonase AiiA from Bacillus subtilis, confirming that AHL contributes to enhance the swarming ability of S. maltophilia. Finally, mutation of smoR resulted in a swarming alteration and an apparent insensitivity to the exogenous AHLs provided by P. aeruginosa. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that S. maltophilia senses AHLs produced by neighboring bacteria through the LuxR solo SmoR, regulating population behaviors such as swarming motility.

Indexed as

Gene Expression Regulation, BacterialAcyl-ButyrolactonesDNA, BacterialLocomotionMolecular Sequence DataPseudomonas aeruginosaRepressor ProteinsSequence Analysis, DNAStenotrophomonas maltophiliaTrans-ActivatorsAcyl-ButyrolactonesDNA, BacterialLuxR autoinducer binding proteinsRepressor ProteinsTrans-ActivatorsAcyl-Homoserine lactoneAHLlactonaseLuxR Orphanquorum sensingswarming

Identifiers

PMID26029670
PMCPMC4432800
OpenAlexW1577564526

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.