Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029287›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2015

Patient experiences living with pancreatic cancer risk.

Meghan Underhill, Donna Berry, Emily Dalton, Jaclyn Schienda, Sapna Syngal

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Health Care Provider Perceptions of Caring for Individuals with Inherited Pancreatic Cancer Risk.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2020
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Familial pancreatic cancer: Concept, management and issues.World journal of gastroenterology · 2017
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Meghan UnderhillDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA.
Donna BerryDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA.
Emily DaltonAmbry Genetics, (previously Dana-Farber Cancer Institute), Boston, MA USA.
Jaclyn SchiendaDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA.
Sapna SyngalDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA USA.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute · US

Funding

U Mass Boston / DFHCC U54 Partnership (1 of 2)U54CA156732 · NCI · DANA-FARBER CANCER INST · PI Nikhil Wagle · 2010 to 2026
$25.6M
Pancreatic Cancer Genetic Epidemiology Consortium (PACGENE)R01CA097075 · NCI · MAYO CLINIC ROCHESTER · PI PETERSEN, GLORIA M. · 2002 to 2012
$15.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA097075NCI NIH HHS U54 CA156732
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPancreatic cancer (PancCa) is recognized as a component of many well-described hereditary cancer syndromes. Minimal research has focused on patient needs and experiences living with this risk. PURPOSE: To understand the meaning and experience of living with familial PancCa risk and to explore experiences related to screening and prevention of PancCa.

methodsParticipants underwent semi-structured, in-depth interviews. Adults without PancCa and who met familial or hereditary risk criteria were eligible. Thematic analysis was completed on the transcripts in order to identify patterns, consistencies, and differences. Narrative review of existing literature related to women living with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) risk was completed to explore similarities and differences between published findings and our current findings.

resultsNineteen individuals (9 male, 10 female) participated. Major themes addressed participants' family experiences with PancCa and PancCa death and the associated grief from the experiences. Family experiences impacted how participants interpreted and approached their own cancer risk and participated in the cancer screening program. Participants wanted to control their cancer risk and sought information and resources to prevent PancCa or PancCa related death. Distress related to risk was not described as constant but occurred around salient time points. CONCLUSION & FUTURE IMPLICATIONS: Study results begin to describe the lived experience of individuals with PancCa risk. Through this research we have uncovered important variables to further understand, measure, and intervene upon in future research. Distress related to risk was not described as ongoing, but occurred around specific and salient time points that brought risk to the forefront. Individuals with familial PancCa risk may have a unique experience compared to other hereditary cancer syndromes due to the high mortality of the disease and uncertainty related to prevention and early detection outcomes.

Indexed as

Pancreatic cancer riskPatient reported experienceQualitative research

Identifiers

PMID26029287
PMCPMC4449523
OpenAlexW2158607849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.