ArticleTranslational behavioral medicine2015
Theory-based approach for maintaining resistance training in older adults with prediabetes: adherence, barriers, self-regulation strategies, treatment fidelity, costs.
Article in Translational behavioral medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- Evaluating the Feasibility and Acceptability of a Culturally Adapted Intervention to Promote Resistance Exercise in Young Black Women: A Randomized Controlled Trial.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2026Trial
- Resistance training is associated with spontaneous changes in aerobic physical activity but not overall diet quality in adults with prediabetes.Physiology & behavior · 2017Trial
- Resist diabetes: A randomized clinical trial for resistance training maintenance in adults with prediabetes.PloS one · 2017Trial
- Psychosocial mediators of a theory-based resistance training maintenance intervention for prediabetic adults.Psychology & health · 2016Trial
- Facilitators, barriers, and interventions for exercise adherence in patients with prediabetes: a mixed-methods systematic review.Therapeutic advances in endocrinology and metabolism · 2026Review
- Factors influencing regular exercise in young women: a survey study assessing the preferences and motivators for aerobic and muscle-strengthening exercise.Health psychology and behavioral medicine · 2025Article
- Adapting the "Resist Diabetes" Resistance Training Intervention for Veterans.Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine · 2020Article
- Evidence-Based, High-Intensity Exercise and Physical Activity for Compressing Morbidity in Older Adults: A Narrative Review.Innovation in aging · 2019Article
- A higher effort-based paradigm in physical activity and exercise for public health: making the case for a greater emphasis on resistance training.BMC public health · 2017Article
- Selecting Resistance Training Exercises for Novices: A Delphi Study with Expert Consensus.American journal of lifestyle medicineArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Effectively preventing and treating chronic diseases through health behavior changes often require intensive theory- and evidence-based intervention including long-term maintenance components. We assessed the efficacy of theory-based maintenance approaches varying by dose for persistently performing resistance training (RT) with the hypothesis that a higher-dose social cognitive theory (SCT) approach would produce greater RT adherence than lower-dose Standard. The Resist-Diabetes study first established 2×/week resistance training (RT) in a 3-month supervised intervention in older (50-69 years, N = 170), overweight to obese (BMI 25-39.9 kg/m(2)) previously inactive adults who fit prediabetes criteria (fasting glucose concentration = 95-125 mg/dl; oral glucose tolerance test 2-h glucose concentration = 140-199 mg/dl or both). After the supervised phase, participants (N = 159) were then randomly assigned to one of two conditions for transition (3 weeks) and then RT alone in community settings for extended contact, maintenance (6 months), and then no contact (6 months). SCT featured continued tailored, interactive personal, and web-based check-ups focused on RT, self-regulation, and a barrier/strategies approach. Standard involved low-dose, generic personal, and web-based check-ups within the same theoretical approach. SCT and Standard both resulted in similar RT, 2×/week adherence during maintenance (74.4 %) and no-contact phases (53.1 %). Cost analysis indicated the Standard intervention for transition and maintenance was inexpensive ($160). Standard can be translated into practice with the potential for continuous contact and persistence in RT beyond the typical program maintenance phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.