Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029273›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurodevelopmental disorders2015

A multidisciplinary approach unravels early and persistent effects of X-ray exposure at the onset of prenatal neurogenesis.

Tine Verreet, Roel Quintens, Debby Van Dam, Mieke Verslegers, Mirella Tanori, Arianna Casciati, Mieke Neefs, Liselotte Leysen, Arlette Michaux, Ann Janssen and 9 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurodevelopmental disorders, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Resting-State Functional MRI and PET Imaging as Noninvasive Tools to Study (Ab)Normal Neurodevelopment in Humans and Rodents.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2023
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. DNA damage and repair: underlying mechanisms leading to microcephaly.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2023
    Review
  9. Ionizing radiation alters functional neurotransmission inFrontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Tine VerreetRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium ; Laboratory of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Roel QuintensRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Debby Van DamLaboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, Institute Born-Bunge, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium.
Mieke VerslegersRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Mirella TanoriLaboratory of Radiation Biology and Biomedicine, Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, Casaccia Research Centre, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy.
Arianna CasciatiLaboratory of Radiation Biology and Biomedicine, Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, Casaccia Research Centre, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy.
Mieke NeefsRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Liselotte LeysenRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Arlette MichauxRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Ann JanssenRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Emiliano D'AgostinoSB Dosimetry and Calibration, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Greetje Vande VeldeBiomedical NMR Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Sarah BaatoutRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Lieve MoonsLaboratory of Neural Circuit Development and Regeneration, Department of Biology, Faculty of Science, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Simonetta PazzagliaLaboratory of Radiation Biology and Biomedicine, Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, Casaccia Research Centre, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy.
Anna SaranLaboratory of Radiation Biology and Biomedicine, Agenzia Nazionale per le Nuove Tecnologie, Casaccia Research Centre, l'Energia e lo Sviluppo Economico Sostenibile (ENEA), 00123 Rome, Italy.
Uwe HimmelreichBiomedical NMR Unit, Department of Imaging and Pathology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium ; Molecular Small Animal Imaging Center (MoSAIC), Faculty of Medicine, University of Leuven, 3000 Leuven, Belgium.
Peter Paul De DeynLaboratory of Neurochemistry and Behaviour, Institute Born-Bunge, Department of Biomedical Sciences, University of Antwerp, 2610 Wilrijk, Belgium ; Department of Neurology and Alzheimer Research Center, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Mohammed Abderrafi BenotmaneRadiobiology Unit, Laboratory of Molecular and Cellular Biology, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK•CEN, 2400 Mol, Belgium.
Belgian Nuclear Research Centre · BENational Agency for New Technologies, Energy and Sustainable Economic Development · ITKU Leuven · BEUniversity of Antwerp · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn humans, in utero exposure to ionising radiation results in an increased prevalence of neurological aberrations, such as small head size, mental retardation and decreased IQ levels. Yet, the association between early damaging events and long-term neuronal anomalies remains largely elusive.

methodsMice were exposed to different X-ray doses, ranging between 0.0 and 1.0 Gy, at embryonic days (E) 10, 11 or 12 and subjected to behavioural tests at 12 weeks of age. Underlying mechanisms of irradiation at E11 were further unravelled using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and spectroscopy, diffusion tensor imaging, gene expression profiling, histology and immunohistochemistry.

resultsIrradiation at the onset of neurogenesis elicited behavioural changes in young adult mice, dependent on the timing of exposure. As locomotor behaviour and hippocampal-dependent spatial learning and memory were most particularly affected after irradiation at E11 with 1.0 Gy, this condition was used for further mechanistic analyses, focusing on the cerebral cortex and hippocampus. A classical p53-mediated apoptotic response was found shortly after exposure. Strikingly, in the neocortex, the majority of apoptotic and microglial cells were residing in the outer layer at 24 h after irradiation, suggesting cell death occurrence in differentiating neurons rather than proliferating cells. Furthermore, total brain volume, cortical thickness and ventricle size were decreased in the irradiated embryos. At 40 weeks of age, MRI showed that the ventricles were enlarged whereas N-acetyl aspartate concentrations and functional anisotropy were reduced in the cortex of the irradiated animals, indicating a decrease in neuronal cell number and persistent neuroinflammation. Finally, in the hippocampus, we revealed a reduction in general neurogenic proliferation and in the amount of Sox2-positive precursors after radiation exposure, although only at a juvenile age.

conclusionsOur findings provide evidence for a radiation-induced disruption of mouse brain development, resulting in behavioural differences. We propose that alterations in cortical morphology and juvenile hippocampal neurogenesis might both contribute to the observed aberrant behaviour. Furthermore, our results challenge the generally assumed view of a higher radiosensitivity in dividing cells. Overall, this study offers new insights into irradiation-dependent effects in the embryonic brain, of relevance for the neurodevelopmental and radiobiological field.

Indexed as

ApoptosisBrain developmentCognitive dysfunctionMRIRadiation

Identifiers

PMID26029273
PMCPMC4448911
OpenAlexW2117190551

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.