ReviewISBT science series2015
Review in ISBT science series, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Cross-species therapeutics in Plasmodium and Babesia: erythrocyte invasion and conserved drug targets.Tropical animal health and production · 2026Review
- Plasmodium knowlesi and global changes: socio-ecological drivers and challenges.Malaria journal · 2025Review
- Emerging Molecular Mechanisms in Malaria Pathogenesis and Novel Therapeutic Approaches: A Focus onBiomolecules · 2025Review
- Emerging malaria in Indonesia: An overview ofParasite epidemiology and control · 2025Article
- Cloning, Expression, Purification, and Characterization of Lactate Dehydrogenase fromInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Glycosylation in malaria parasites: what do we know?Trends in parasitology · 2024Review
- Disentangling the intersection of inequities with health and malaria exposure: key lessons from rural communities in Northern Borneo.Malaria journal · 2023Article
- Environmental Change, Changing Biodiversity, and Infections-Lessons for Kidney Health Community.Kidney international reports · 2023Review
- In Silico Analysis Reveals High Levels of Genetic Diversity ofTropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Article
- Exploring the key anthropological drivers of and barriers to zoonotic malaria preventative behaviour in a community exposed toBMJ open · 2022Article
- Cnidarians as a potential source of antiparasitic drugs.Parasitology research · 2022Review
- CRISPR-Based Programmable Nucleic Acid-Binding Protein Technology Can Specifically Detect Fatal Tropical Disease-Causing Pathogens.Journal of tropical medicine · 2022Review
- Editorial: Identification and Characterization of Novel Antigens of Malarial Parasites.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Extracellular vesicles in malaria: an agglomeration of two decades of research.Malaria journal · 2021Review
- Comparison of a New IgG-EIA for the Detection of Anti-Plasmodium Antibodies with Two Currently Used Assays.Transfusion medicine and hemotherapy : offizielles Organ der Deutschen Gesellschaft fur Transfusionsmedizin und Immunhamatologie · 2021Article
- Identification, Mapping, and Genetic Diversity of Novel Conserved Cross-Species Epitopes of RhopH2 inFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Article
- Diagnostic Methods for Non-Falciparum Malaria.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2021Review
- New vectors in northern Sarawak, Malaysian Borneo, for the zoonotic malaria parasite, Plasmodium knowlesi.Parasites & vectors · 2020Article
- A protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis of optimizing treatment for malaria.Medicine · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Ten years have passed since the publication of a large focus of
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.