Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029220›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2015

Time course of biochemical, physiological, and molecular responses to field-mimicked conditions of drought, salinity, and recovery in two maize lines.

Francesco Morari, Franco Meggio, Alice Lunardon, Elia Scudiero, Cristian Forestan, Silvia Farinati, Serena Varotto

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Molecular Responses of Maize Shoot to a Plant Derived Smoke Solution.International journal of molecular sciences · 2019
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Francesco MorariDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.
Franco MeggioDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.
Alice LunardonDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.
Elia ScudieroDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.
Cristian ForestanDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.
Silvia FarinatiDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.
Serena VarottoDepartment of Agronomy, Animals, Food, Natural Resources and Environment, University of Padova Agripolis Viale dell'Università Padova, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Drought and salinity stresses will have a high impact on future crop productivity, due to climate change and the increased competition for land, water, and energy. The response to drought (WS), salinity (SS), and the combined stresses (WS+SS) was monitored in two maize lines: the inbred B73 and an F1 commercial stress-tolerant hybrid. A protocol mimicking field progressive stress conditions was developed and its effect on plant growth analyzed at different time points. The results indicated that the stresses limited growth in the hybrid and arrested it in the inbred line. In SS, the two genotypes had different ion accumulation and translocation capacity, particularly for Na(+) and Cl(-). Moreover, the hybrid perceived the stress, reduced all the analyzed physiological parameters, and kept them reduced until the recovery. B73 decreased all physiological parameters more gradually, being affected mainly by SS. Both lines recovered better from WS than the other stresses. Molecular analysis revealed a diverse modulation of some stress markers in the two genotypes, reflecting their different response to stresses. Combining biochemical and physiological data with expression analyses yielded insight into the mechanisms regulating the different stress tolerance of the two lines.

Indexed as

abiotic stressdroughtmaizesalinitystress marker genesstress responsestress tolerance

Identifiers

PMID26029220
PMCPMC4429227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.