ReviewFrontiers in neurology2015
Owls and larks in mice.
Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- Female chronotype is not related to annual and lifetime reproductive success in a free-living songbird.Royal Society open science · 2025Article
- Site- and cell-type-specific miRNA and mRNA genes and networks across the cortex, striatum, and hypothalamus.Communications biology · 2025Article
- Long-lasting effects of disturbing the circadian rhythm or sleep in adolescence.Brain research bulletin · 2024Review
- Correlation Analysis Between Time Awareness and Morningness-Eveningness Preference.Journal of circadian rhythms · 2023Article
- The Role of the Melatoninergic System in Circadian and Seasonal Rhythms-Insights From Different Mouse Strains.Frontiers in physiology · 2022Review
- Dissecting the Roles of the Autonomic Nervous System and Physical Activity on Circadian Heart Rate Fluctuations in Mice.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
- Impact of Targeted Deletion of the Circadian Clock Gene Bmal1 in Excitatory Forebrain Neurons on Adult Neurogenesis and Olfactory Function.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Article
- Clocks in the Wild: Entrainment to Natural Light.Frontiers in physiology · 2020Article
- Clocking In, Working Out: Circadian Regulation of Exercise Physiology.Trends in endocrinology and metabolism: TEM · 2019Review
- Two sides of a coin: ecological and chronobiological perspectives of timing in the wild.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2017Review
- The Role of the Melatoninergic System in Light-Entrained Behavior of Mice.International journal of molecular sciences · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Humans come in different chronotypes and, particularly, the late chronotype (the so-called owl) has been shown to be associated with several health risks. A number of studies show that laboratory mice also display various chronotypes. In mice as well as in humans, the chronotype shows correlations with the period length and rhythm stability. In addition, some mouse models for human diseases show alterations in their chronotypic behavior, which are comparable to those humans. Thus, analysis of the behavior of mice is a powerful tool to unravel the molecular and genetic background of the chronotype and the prevalence of risks and diseases that are associated with it. In this review, we summarize the correlation of chronotype with free-running period length and rhythm stability in inbred mouse strains, in mice with a compromised molecular clockwork, and in a mouse model for neurodegeneration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.