Two steps to space for numbers.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Training the equidistant principle of number line spacing.Cognitive processing · 2016
   Trial
2. The reciprocity of spatial-numerical associations of vocal response codes depends on stimulus mode.Memory & cognition · 2024
   Article
3. Modal and amodal cognition: an overarching principle in various domains of psychology.Psychological research · 2024
   Review
4. The SNARC effect: a preregistered study on the interaction of horizontal, vertical, and sagittal spatial-numerical associations.Psychological research · 2023
   Article
5. Comparing Symbolic and Nonsymbolic Number Lines: Consistent Effects of Notation Across Output Measures.Advances in cognitive psychology · 2018
   Article
6. The SNARC Effect in Chinese Numerals: Do Visual Properties of Characters and Hand Signs Influence Number Processing?PloS one
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as