Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029117›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2015

Unexpected plant odor responses in a moth pheromone system.

Angéla Rouyar, Nina Deisig, Fabienne Dupuy, Denis Limousin, Marie-Anne Wycke, Michel Renou, Sylvia Anton

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. A plant volatile alters the perception of sex pheromone blend ratios in a moth.Journal of comparative physiology. A, Neuroethology, sensory, neural, and behavioral physiology · 2020
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Decoding ants' olfactory system sheds light on the evolution of social communication.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2017
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Angéla RouyarInstitut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, INRA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Versailles, France.
Nina DeisigInstitut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, INRA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Versailles, France.
Fabienne DupuyNeuroéthologie-RCIM, INRA-Université d'Angers Beaucouzé, France.
Denis LimousinInstitut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, INRA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Versailles, France.
Marie-Anne WyckeInstitut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, INRA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Versailles, France.
Michel RenouInstitut d'Ecologie et des Sciences de l'Environnement de Paris, INRA, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Versailles, France.
Sylvia AntonNeuroéthologie-RCIM, INRA-Université d'Angers Beaucouzé, France.
Sorbonne Université · FRUniversité d'Angers · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Male moths rely on olfactory cues to find females for reproduction. Males also use volatile plant compounds (VPCs) to find food sources and might use host-plant odor cues to identify the habitat of calling females. Both the sex pheromone released by conspecific females and VPCs trigger well-described oriented flight behavior toward the odor source. Whereas detection and central processing of pheromones and VPCs have been thought for a long time to be highly separated from each other, recent studies have shown that interactions of both types of odors occur already early at the periphery of the olfactory pathway. Here we show that detection and early processing of VPCs and pheromone can overlap between the two sub-systems. Using complementary approaches, i.e., single-sensillum recording of olfactory receptor neurons, in vivo calcium imaging in the antennal lobe, intracellular recordings of neurons in the macroglomerular complex (MGC) and flight tracking in a wind tunnel, we show that some plant odorants alone, such as heptanal, activate the pheromone-specific pathway in male Agrotis ipsilon at peripheral and central levels. To our knowledge, this is the first report of a plant odorant with no chemical similarity to the molecular structure of the pheromone, acting as a partial agonist of a moth sex pheromone.

Indexed as

antennal lobecentral neuroninsect olfactioninteractionolfactory receptor neuronsex pheromonevolatile plant compounds

Identifiers

PMID26029117
PMCPMC4429231
OpenAlexW1924878271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.