Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029116›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in physiology2015

New techniques for motion-artifact-free in vivo cardiac microscopy.

Claudio Vinegoni, Sungon Lee, Aaron D Aguirre, Ralph Weissleder

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 41 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. In Vivo Click Chemistry Enables Multiplexed Intravital Microscopy.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2022
    Article
  7. Recent advances in nonlinear microscopy: Deep insights and polarized revelations.The international journal of biochemistry & cell biology · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Frontiers in physiology · 2018
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Claudio VinegoniCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Sungon LeeCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA ; School of Electrical Engineering, Hanyang University Ansan, South Korea.
Aaron D AguirreCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Ralph WeisslederCenter for Systems Biology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School Boston, MA, USA.
Harvard University · USCenter for Systems Biology · US

Funding

Noninvasive Cardiovascular Imaging Research Training ProgramT32HL094301 · NHLBI · BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL · PI Marcelo F DI CARLI · 2010 to 2026
$7.8M
Integrated FMT approaches for biomolecular measurementsR01EB006432 · NIBIB · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WEISSLEDER, MD, PHD, RALPH · 2006 to 2013
$3.0M
Single Cell Imaging of the HeartR01HL122208 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI WEISSLEDER, MD, PHD, RALPH · 2014 to 2017
$1.7M
NHLBI NIH HHS HHSN268201000044CNHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL122208NHLBI NIH HHS T32 HL094301NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB006432
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intravital imaging microscopy (i.e., imaging in live animals at microscopic resolution) has become an indispensable tool for studying the cellular micro-dynamics in cancer, immunology and neurobiology. High spatial and temporal resolution, combined with large penetration depth and multi-reporter visualization capability make fluorescence intravital microscopy compelling for heart imaging. However, tissue motion caused by cardiac contraction and respiration critically limits its use. As a result, in vitro cell preparations or non-contracting explanted heart models are more commonly employed. Unfortunately, these approaches fall short of understanding the more complex host physiology that may be dynamic and occur over longer periods of time. In this review, we report on novel technologies, which have been recently developed by our group and others, aimed at overcoming motion-induced artifacts and capable of providing in vivo subcellular resolution imaging in the beating mouse heart. The methods are based on mechanical stabilization, image processing algorithms, gated/triggered acquisition schemes or a combination of both. We expect that in the immediate future all these methodologies will have considerable applications in expanding our understanding of the cardiac biology, elucidating cardiomyocyte function and interactions within the organism in vivo, and ultimately improving the treatment of cardiac diseases.

Indexed as

cardiac imagingimage stabilizationlaser scanning microscopymotion artifactsmotion compensation

Identifiers

PMID26029116
PMCPMC4428079
OpenAlexW1960138240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.