Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26029022›Full record

ArticleRadiology and oncology2015

Thyroid lesions incidentally detected by (18)F-FDG PET-CT - a two centre retrospective study.

Jan Jamsek, Ivana Zagar, Simona Gaberscek, Marko Grmek

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology and oncology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. The dilemma ofEndocrine · 2021
    Pooled it
  2. Focal Thyroid Incidentalomas onFrontiers in endocrinology · 2021
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Characteristics of malignant thyroid lesions on [European journal of radiology open · 2021
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Thyroid incidentalomas on 18FDG-PET/CT: a metabolico-pathological correlation.Journal of otolaryngology - head & neck surgery = Le Journal d'oto-rhino-laryngologie et de chirurgie cervico-faciale · 2017
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jan JamsekFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Ivana ZagarDepartment for Nuclear Medicine, Institute of Oncology Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Simona GaberscekFaculty of Medicine, University of Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia ; Department for Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.
Marko GrmekDepartment for Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Ljubljana, Ljubljana, Slovenia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIncidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid on PET-CT examinations represents a diagnostic challenge. The maximal standardized uptake value (SUVmax) is one possible parameter that can help in distinguishing between benign and malignant thyroid PET lesions. PATIENTS AND

methodsWe retrospectively evaluated (18)F-FDG PET-CT examinations of 5,911 patients performed at two different medical centres from 2010 to 2011. If pathologically increased activity was accidentally detected in the thyroid, the SUVmax of the thyroid lesion was calculated. Patients with incidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid were instructed to visit a thyroidologist, who performed further investigation including fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) if needed. Lesions deemed suspicious after FNAC were referred for surgery.

resultsIncidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% - in 230 out of 5,911 patients investigated on PET-CT. Malignant thyroid lesions (represented with focal thyroid uptake) were detected in 10 of 66 patients (in 15.2%). In the first medical centre the SUVmax of 36 benign lesions was 5.6 ± 2.8 compared to 15.8 ± 9.2 of 5 malignant lesions (p < 0.001). In the second centre the SUVmax of 20 benign lesions was 3.7 ± 2.2 compared to 5.1 ± 2.3 of 5 malignant lesions (p = 0.217). All 29 further investigated diffuse thyroid lesions were benign.

conclusionsIncidental (18)F-FDG uptake in the thyroid was found in 3.89% of patients who had a PET-CT examination. Only focal thyroid uptake represented a malignant lesion in our study - in 15.2% of all focal thyroid lesions. SUVmax should only serve as one of several parameters that alert the clinician on the possibility of thyroid malignancy.

Indexed as

18F-FDGPET-CTPET incidentalomathyroidthyroid cancer

Identifiers

PMID26029022
PMCPMC4387987

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.