ReviewThe Yale journal of biology and medicine2015
Evolution of multidisciplinary brain metastasis management: case study and literature review.
Review in The Yale journal of biology and medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Multidisciplinary management strategies for recurrent brain metastasis after prior radiotherapy: An overview.Neuro-oncology · 2025Review
- Brain metastasis localized to the same area of infarction: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2023Article
- Editorial: It takes a village: The expanding multi-disciplinary approach to brain metastasis.Frontiers in oncology · 2022Article
- Operative and peri-operative considerations in the management of brain metastasis.Cancer medicine · 2019Review
- Spine Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Outcomes in Patients with Concurrent Brain Metastases.Cureus · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Up to 40 percent of all cancer patients develop brain metastasis (BM) during the course of their disease. Despite advances in diagnosis and therapy, prognosis in patients with BM remains poor for many patients, but for some, survival can be of the order of several years in duration. Difficulty in predicting long-term survivors has created controversy in contemporary management of BM. Minimizing medical and neurocognitive side effects (disease borne or iatrogenic) to enhance functional independence and improving overall quality of life in these individuals requires a coordinated approach of first-line and salvage surgical, chemotherapeutic (cytotoxic, targeted, or immune based), and radiation (whole brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery) modalities. This goal needs to be balanced against the more traditional targets of management such as symptom relief, reducing tumor burden, and local tumor control, thereby increasing progression-free survival. This case study and literature review demonstrates the role of various treatment modalities in the management of BM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26029014PMC4445437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.