Observational studyInternational journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease2015
Factors associated with inadequate diagnosis of COPD: On-Sint cohort analysis.
Observational study in International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.
- Multimorbidity and Patient Safety Incidents in Primary Care: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PloS one · 2015Pooled it
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease prevalence and prediction in a high-risk lung cancer screening population.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2020Trial
- A population-based analysis of spirometry use and the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in lung cancer.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Multimorbidity and patient-reported diagnostic errors in the primary care setting: multicentre cross-sectional study in Japan.BMJ open · 2020Article
- COPD overdiagnosis in primary care: a UK observational study of consistency of airflow obstruction.NPJ primary care respiratory medicine · 2019Observational
- Quantification of inaccurate diagnosis of COPD in primary care medicine: an analysis of the COACH clinical audit.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2019Observational
- Do not do in COPD: consensus statement on overuse.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018Article
- Reliability and usefulness of spirometry performed during admission for COPD exacerbation.PloS one · 2018Article
- [Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in real life. LEONPOC study].Atencion primaria · 2017Observational
- Overdiagnosis of COPD: precise definitions and proposals for improvement.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2017Article
- Characteristics of COPD patients according to GOLD classification and clinical phenotypes in the Russian Federation: the SUPPORT trial.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2017Observational
- Evaluation of clinical variables according to follow-up times in COPD: results from ON-SINT cohort.European clinical respiratory journal · 2017Article
- Follow-up study on management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in Hunan Province, the People's Republic of China.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2016Article
- Evaluation of the COPD Assessment Test and GOLD patient types: a cross-sectional analysis.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of inadequate diagnosis and factors predictive of this in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) participating in the On-Sint study.
methodsThe On-Sint cohort was recruited for a multicenter observational study in which 356 physicians (71.6% from primary care) included adult patients who had been diagnosed with COPD. Patients' clinical and functional information since diagnosis and details for the recruiting physicians were collected from patient files and at the inclusion visit. We performed a multivariate analysis to evaluate the influence of these variables on diagnostic inadequacy (absence of postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume in one second/forced vital capacity [FEV1/FVC] <0.70 or, if this value was missing, prebronchodilator FEV1/FVC <0.70).
resultsIn total, 1,214 patients were included in the study. The patients had a mean age of 66.4±9.7 years and 78.8% were male. In total, 51.3% of patients did not have an obstructive spirometry performed, and 21.4% had a normal or non-obstructive spirometry pattern. Patient-related factors associated with inadequate diagnosis were: years since diagnosis (odds ratio [OR] 1.03, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.05), number of exacerbations in the previous year (OR 1.01, 95% CI 1.01-1.02), comorbidities (OR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.015), and obesity (OR 1.06, 95% CI 1.02-1.10 per kg/m(2) of body mass index), while a longer smoking history (OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.97-0.99 for each pack/year) and short-acting or long-acting bronchodilator therapy (OR 0.61, 95% CI 0.44-0.76 and OR 0.46, 95% CI 0.27-0.76, respectively) were inversely related. With regard to physician-related variables, being followed up by primary care physicians (OR 3.0, 95% CI 2.11-4.34) and in rural centers (OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.12-2.38) were positively associated with an inadequate diagnosis, while having regular follow-ups in the most severe cases (OR 0.66, 95% CI 0.46-0.93) and use of quality of life questionnaires (OR 0.55, 95% CI 0.40-0.76) were negatively associated.
conclusionDiagnosis of COPD was inadequate in half of the patients from the On-Sint cohort. There were multiple factors, both patient-related and physician-related, associated with this misdiagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.