ArticleJournal of Korean medical science2015
Comparison of Arbekacin and Vancomycin in Treatment of Chronic Suppurative Otitis Media by Methicillin Resistant Staphylococcus aureus.
Article in Journal of Korean medical science, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2025Pooled it
- Topical versus systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Systemic antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2021Pooled it
- Topical antibiotics with steroids for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Topical antibiotics for chronic suppurative otitis media.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2020Pooled it
- Clinical efficacy and safety of arbekacin for high-risk infections in patients with hematological malignancies.International journal of hematology · 2016Trial
- Protective role of resveratrol against VCM-induced hepatotoxicity in male wistar rats.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023Article
- Arbekacin as an Alternative Drug to Teicoplanin for the Treatment of MRSA Infection.Yonsei medical journal · 2016Article
- Clinical Usefulness of Arbekacin.Infection & chemotherapy · 2016Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) is a major cause of ear infections. We attempted to evaluate the clinical usefulness of arbekacin in treating chronic suppurative otitis media (CSOM) by comparing its clinical efficacy and toxicity with those of vancomycin. Efficacy was classified according to bacterial elimination or bacteriologic failure and improved or failed clinical efficacy response. Ninety-five subjects were diagnosed with CSOM caused by MRSA. Twenty of these subjects were treated with arbekacin, and 36 with vancomycin. The bacteriological efficacy (bacterial elimination, arbekacin vs. vancomycin: 85.0% vs. 97.2%) and improved clinical efficacy (arbekacin vs. vancomycin; 90.0% vs. 97.2%) were not different between the two groups. However, the rate of complications was higher in the vancomycin group (33.3%) than in the arbekacin group (5.0%) (P=0.020). In addition, a total of 12 adverse reactions were observed in the vancomycin group; two for hepatotoxicity, one for nephrotoxicity, eight for leukopenia, two for skin rash, and one for drug fever. It is suggested that arbekacin be a good alternative drug to vancomycin in treatment of CSOM caused by MRSA.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.