Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26028809›Full record

ArticleBiology of sport2015

Rating of perceived exertion as a tool for prescribing and self regulating interval training: a pilot study.

E G Ciolac, S S Mantuani, C M Neiva, Cel Verardi, D M Pessôa-Filho, L Pimenta

2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of sport, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03700671 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2016, after this paper: background citation

The Effects of Low-Volume High Intensity Interval Training and Circuit Training on Maximal Oxygen Uptake

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of Central LancashireRan2016 to 2017Enrolled42ConditionsHigh Intensity Interval TrainingArmsHigh intensity interval training, Circuit training
NCT06509282 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2023, after this paper: background citation

Efficacy of a Personalized Concurrent Exercise Prescription Guide for Controlling Cardiovascular Risk and Enhancing Physical Fitness in Adults From a Cardiovascular Health Program: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversidad San SebastiánRan2023 to 2024Enrolled39ConditionsCardiovascular Syndrome, MetabolicArmsConcurrent training
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Assessment of Exercise Intensity for Uphill Walking in Healthy Adults Performed Indoors and Outdoors.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  10. Article
  11. The Effect of Endurance Training on Pulmonary V˙OInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

E G CiolacSão Paulo State University - UNESP, School of Sciences, Physical Education Department, Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Bauru, Brazil.
S S MantuaniAnhanguera University of São Paulo, Health Sciences Department, Santo André, Brazil.
C M NeivaSão Paulo State University - UNESP, School of Sciences, Physical Education Department, Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Bauru, Brazil ; Faculty of Medicine, University of Ribeirão Preto - UNAERP, Ribeirão Preto, Brazil ; Health Promotion Ph.D. Program, University of Franca - UNIFRAN, Franca, Brazil.
Cel VerardiSão Paulo State University - UNESP, School of Sciences, Physical Education Department, Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Bauru, Brazil.
D M Pessôa-FilhoSão Paulo State University - UNESP, School of Sciences, Physical Education Department, Exercise and Chronic Disease Research Laboratory, Bauru, Brazil.
L PimentaAnhanguera University of São Paulo, Health Sciences Department, Santo André, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to analyse the usefulness of the 6-20 rating of perceived exertion (RPE) scale for prescribing and self-regulating high-intensity interval training (HIT) in young individuals. Eight healthy young subjects (age = 27.5±6.7 years) performed maximal graded exercise testing to determine their maximal and reserve heart rate (HR). Subjects then performed two HIT sessions (20 min on a treadmill) prescribed and regulated by their HR (HR: 1 min at 50% alternated with 1 min at 85% of reserve HR) or RPE (RPE: 1 minute at the 9-11 level [very light-fairly light] alternated with 1 minute at the 15-17 level [hard-very hard]) in random order. HR response and walking/running speed during the 20 min of exercise were compared between sessions. No significant difference between sessions was observed in HR during low- (HR: 135±15 bpm; RPE: 138±20 bpm) and high-intensity intervals (HR: 168±15 bpm; RPE: 170±18 bpm). Walking/running speed during low- (HR: 5.7±1.2 km · h(-1); RPE: 5.7±1.3 km · h(-1)) and high-intensity intervals (HR: 7.8±1.9 km · h(-1); RPE: 8.2±1.7 km · h(-1)) was also not different between sessions. No significant differences were observed in HR response and walking/running speed between HIT sessions prescribed and regulated by HR or RPE. This finding suggests that the 6-20 RPE scale may be a useful tool for prescribing and self-regulating HIT in young subjects.

Indexed as

exercise prescriptionheart ratehigh-intensity interval trainingrating of perceived exertion

Identifiers

PMID26028809
PMCPMC4296211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.