Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26028762›Full record

ArticleJournal of food science and technology2015

Optimization studies for enhanced bacteriocin production by Pediococcus pentosaceus KC692718 using response surface methodology.

V Suganthi, V Mohanasrinivasan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of food science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. A novel of new class II bacteriocin fromFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Competition amongVeterinary sciences · 2018
    Article
  16. Enhanced Bacteriocin Production byFrontiers in microbiology · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

V SuganthiEnvironmental Biotechnology Division, School of Bio Sciences & Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu India.
V MohanasrinivasanEnvironmental Biotechnology Division, School of Bio Sciences & Technology, Vellore Institute of Technology University, Vellore, Tamil Nadu India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bacteriocins have been produced by various Lactic acid bacteria (LAB) strains isolated from dairy and fermented vegetable sources. In the current study we have isolated a novel bacteriocin producing strain Pediococcus pentosaceus KC692718 from mixed vegetable pickles (India). A 2 step process optimization for enhancing production of bacteriocin from the isolates was carried out with One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) and Response Surface Methodology (RSM) methods. A 2.5 fold (AU/mL) increase of bacteriocin was observed for sucrose (2.4 %) as carbon source and 4.7 fold (AU/mL) increased bacteriocin was observed in the presence of soyatone (1.03 %) as nitrogen source in the OFAT experiments. In order to increase bacteriocin production RSM tool was performed with optimized chemical and physical sources using Design expert 8.0.7.1. Soyatone (1.03 %), sucrose (2.4 %), pH (5.5) and temperature (34.5 ºC) condition yielded 25,600.34 AU/mL of bacteriocin from P. pentosaceus KC692718. This is the first report which has produced 20 fold increase of bacteriocin for Pediococcus pentosaceus KC692718 from that of MRS medium with 1 280 AU/mL.

Indexed as

BacteriocinCentral composite designOptimizationPediococcus pentosaceus KC692718Response surface methodology

Identifiers

PMID26028762
PMCPMC4444917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.