Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26028701›Full record

ReviewJournal of food science and technology2015

Review of methods for the detection and quantification of adulteration of rice: Basmati as a case study.

Lakshminarayana R Vemireddy, V V Satyavathi, E A Siddiq, J Nagaraju

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of food science and technology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Lakshminarayana R VemireddyInstitute of Biotechnology, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030 AP India.
V V SatyavathiLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Nampally, Hyderabad, AP India.
E A SiddiqInstitute of Biotechnology, Acharya NG Ranga Agricultural University, Rajendranagar, Hyderabad, 500030 AP India.
J NagarajuLaboratory of Molecular Genetics, Centre for DNA Fingerprinting and Diagnostics, Nampally, Hyderabad, AP India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Rice is a staple and widely grown crop endowed with rich genetic diversity. As it is difficult to differentiate seeds of various rice varieties based on visual observation accurately, the harvested seeds and subsequent processed products are highly prone to adulteration with look-alike and low quality seeds by the dishonest traders. To protect the interests of importing countries and consumers, several methods have been employed over the last few decades for unambiguous discrimination of cultivars, accurate quantification of the adulterants, and for determination of cultivated geographical area. With recent advances in biotechnology, DNA based techniques evolved rapidly and proved successful over conventional non-DNA based methods to purge the problem of adulteration at commercial level. In the current review, we made an attempt to summarize the existing methods of adulteration detection and quantification in a comprehensive manner by providing Basmati as a case study to enable the traders to arrive at a quick resolution in choosing the apt method to eliminate the adulteration practice in the global rice industry.

Indexed as

AdulterationBasmati riceMicrosatelliteSSR markers

Identifiers

PMID26028701
PMCPMC4444904

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.