Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26028640›Full record

ReviewEuropean respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society2015

Clinically relevant subgroups in COPD and asthma.

Alice M Turner, Lilla Tamasi, Florence Schleich, Mehmet Hoxha, Ildiko Horvath, Renaud Louis, Neil Barnes

Open access · diamondAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in European respiratory review : an official journal of the European Respiratory Society, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
24citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

24 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. CT densitometry in emphysema: a systematic review of its clinical utility.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Real-Life Effectiveness of Aclidinium/Formoterol on COPD Control: The REDACT Observational Study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2026
    Observational
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Eosinophil-derived IL-13 promotes emphysema.The European respiratory journal · 2019
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Increased urinary l-histidine in patients with asthma-COPD overlap: a pilot study.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  17. Bronchodilator responsiveness or reversibility in asthma and COPD - a need for clarity.International journal of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease · 2018
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Observational
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Alice M TurnerClinical and Experimental Medicine, University of Birmingham, Queen Elizabeth Hospital Birmingham, Birmingham, UK Dept of Respiratory Medicine, Birmingham Heartlands Hospital, Birmingham, UK a.m.wood@bham.ac.uk.
Lilla TamasiDept of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Florence SchleichRespiratory Medicine, CHU Sart-Tilman B35, Liege, Belgium.
Mehmet HoxhaService of Allergology and Clinical Immunology, UHC "Mother Teresa", Tirana, Albania.
Ildiko HorvathDept of Pulmonology, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary.
Renaud LouisRespiratory Medicine, CHU Sart-Tilman B35, Liege, Belgium.
Neil BarnesGlaxoSmithKline, Stockley Park West, Uxbridge, UK.
Semmelweis University · HUGlaxoSmithKline (United Kingdom) · GBMother Teresa Hospital · ALUniversity of Birmingham · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As knowledge of airways disease has grown, it has become apparent that neither chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) nor asthma is a simple, easily defined disease. In the past, treatment options for both diseases were limited; thus, there was less need to define subgroups. As treatment options have grown, so has our need to predict who will respond to new drugs. To date, identifying subgroups has been largely reported by detailed clinical characterisation or differences in pathobiology. These subgroups are commonly called "phenotypes"; however, the problem of defining what constitutes a phenotype, whether this should include comorbid diseases and how to handle changes over time has led to the term being used loosely. In this review, we describe subgroups of COPD and asthma patients whose clinical characteristics we believe have therapeutic or major prognostic implications specific to the lung, and whether these subgroups are constant over time. Finally, we will discuss whether the subgroups we describe are common to both asthma and COPD, and give some examples of how treatment might be tailored in patients where the subgroup is clear, but the label of asthma or COPD is not.

Indexed as

AsthmaPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveComorbidityHumansPatient SelectionPhenotypePredictive Value of TestsPrognosisRisk Factors

Identifiers

PMID26028640
PMCPMC9487805
OpenAlexW1818425815

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.