Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26028120›Full record

Trial reportLancet (London, England)2015

Methadone continuation versus forced withdrawal on incarceration in a combined US prison and jail: a randomised, open-label trial.

Josiah D Rich, Michelle McKenzie, Sarah Larney, John B Wong, Liem Tran, Jennifer Clarke, Amanda Noska, Manasa Reddy, Nickolas Zaller

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Lancet (London, England), 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01874964 (A Randomized Trail of Continues Methadone Maintenance Versus Detoxification in Jail), which is not on this map. Cited by 120 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
120citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
18.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01874964 naunknown statusnot on this map

A Randomized Trail of Continues Methadone Maintenance Versus Detoxification in Jail

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe Miriam HospitalRan2010 to 2014Enrolled450ConditionsOpioid-Related DisordersArmsMethadone Maintenance, Linkage to methadone maintenance
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

120 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 229 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Interventions for female drug-using offenders.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2019
    Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Trial
  14. Trial
  15. Trial
  16. Trial
  17. Trial
  18. Trial
  19. Trial
  20. Trial

60 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Josiah D RichBrown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA. Electronic address: jrich@lifespan.org.
Michelle McKenzieBrown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Sarah LarneyBrown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, University of New South Wales, NSW, Australia.
John B WongTufts Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Liem TranThe Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Jennifer ClarkeBrown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA; Memorial Hospital, Pawtucket, RI, USA.
Amanda NoskaBrown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Manasa ReddyBrown University, Providence, RI, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Nickolas ZallerFay W Boozman College of Public Health, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, AR, USA; The Center for Prisoner Health and Human Rights, The Miriam Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
Brown University · USMiriam Hospital · USTufts Medical Center · USUniversity of Arkansas for Medical Sciences · US

Funding

Translational ScienceP30AI042853 · NIAID · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI CURT G BECKWITH · 1998 to 2026
$51.7M
A Randomized Trial of Continued Methadone Maintenance vs. Detoxification in JailR01DA027211 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI RICH, JOSIAH D · 2009 to 2013
$2.5M
Midcareer Investigator Award in Patient Oriented ResearchK24DA022112 · NIDA · MIRIAM HOSPITAL · PI RICH, JOSIAH D · 2008 to 2017
$1.7M
NIAID NIH HHS P30 AI042853NIAID NIH HHS P30-AI-42853NIDA NIH HHS K24 DA022112NIDA NIH HHS K24DA022112NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA027211NIDA NIH HHS R01DA027211
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMethadone is an effective treatment for opioid dependence. When people who are receiving methadone maintenance treatment for opioid dependence are incarcerated in prison or jail, most US correctional facilities discontinue their methadone treatment, either gradually, or more often, abruptly. This discontinuation can cause uncomfortable symptoms of withdrawal and renders prisoners susceptible to relapse and overdose on release. We aimed to study the effect of forced withdrawal from methadone upon incarceration on individuals' risk behaviours and engagement with post-release treatment programmes.

methodsIn this randomised, open-label trial, we randomly assigned (1:1) inmates of the Rhode Island Department of Corrections (RI, USA) who were enrolled in a methadone maintenance-treatment programme in the community at the time of arrest and wanted to remain on methadone treatment during incarceration and on release, to either continuation of their methadone treatment or to usual care--forced tapered withdrawal from methadone. Participants could be included in the study only if their incarceration would be more than 1 week but less than 6 months. We did the random assignments with a computer-generated random permutation, and urn randomisation procedures to stratify participants by sex and race. Participants in the continued-methadone group were maintained on their methadone dose at the time of their incarceration (with dose adjustments as clinically indicated). Patients in the forced-withdrawal group followed the institution's standard withdrawal protocol of receiving methadone for 1 week at the dose at the time of their incarceration, then a tapered withdrawal regimen (for those on a starting dose >100 mg, the dose was reduced by 5 mg per day to 100 mg, then reduced by 3 mg per day to 0 mg; for those on a starting dose >100 mg, the dose was reduced by 3 mg per day to 0 mg). The main outcomes were engagement with a methadone maintenance-treatment clinic after release from incarceration and time to engagement with methadone maintenance treatment, by intention-to-treat and as-treated analyses, which we established in a follow-up interview with the participants at 1 month after their release from incarceration. Our study paid for 10 weeks of methadone treatment after release if participants needed financial help. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01874964.

findingsBetween June 14, 2011, and April 3, 2013, we randomly assigned 283 prisoners to our study, 142 to continued methadone treatment, and 141 to forced withdrawal from methadone. Of these, 60 were excluded because they did not fit the eligibility criteria, leaving 114 in the continued-methadone group and 109 in the forced-withdrawal group (usual care). Participants assigned to continued methadone were more than twice as likely than forced-withdrawal participants to return to a community methadone clinic within 1 month of release (106 [96%] of 110 in the continued-methadone group compared with 68 [78%] of 87 in the forced-withdrawal group; adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 2·04, 95% CI 1·48-2·80). We noted no differences in serious adverse events between groups. For the continued-methadone and forced-withdrawal groups, the number of deaths were one and zero, non-fatal overdoses were one and two, admissions to hospital were one and four; and emergency-room visits were 11 and 16, respectively.

interpretationAlthough our study had several limitations--eg, it only included participants incarcerated for fewer than 6 months, we showed that forced withdrawal from methadone on incarceration reduced the likelihood of prisoners re-engaging in methadone maintenance after their release. Continuation of methadone maintenance during incarceration could contribute to greater treatment engagement after release, which could in turn reduce the risk of death from overdose and risk behaviours.

fundingNational Institute on Drug Abuse and the Lifespan/Tufts/Brown Center for AIDS Research from the National Institutes of Health.

Indexed as

AdultDrug Administration ScheduleFemaleHumansMaleMethadoneMiddle AgedOpiate Substitution TreatmentOpioid-Related DisordersPatient Acceptance of Health CarePrisonersPrisonsRhode IslandSubstance Abuse Treatment CentersMethadone

Identifiers

PMID26028120
PMCPMC4522212
OpenAlexW2165230254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.