Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26026972›Full record

ArticleInternational urology and nephrology2015

Antimicrobial susceptibilities of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase-producing Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae in health care-associated urinary tract infection: focus on susceptibility to fosfomycin.

Yang Hyun Cho, Seung Il Jung, Ho Suck Chung, Ho Song Yu, Eu Chang Hwang, Sun-Ouck Kim, Taek Won Kang, Dong Deuk Kwon, Kwangsung Park

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in International urology and nephrology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
7.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 62 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiles ofThe Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Fosfomycin Resistance inAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Community-Acquired Urinary Tract Infection byBioMed research international · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Fosfomycin.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2016
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yang Hyun ChoDepartments of Urology, Chonnam National University Medical School, Gwangju, Republic of Korea.
Seung Il Jung
Ho Suck Chung
Ho Song Yu
Eu Chang Hwang
Sun-Ouck Kim
Taek Won Kang
Dong Deuk Kwon
Kwangsung Park
Chonnam National University Hospital · KR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe appearance of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase (ESBL)-producing gram-negative bacteria in urinary tract infection (UTI) constitutes an important therapeutic challenge. The aim of this study was to describe drug susceptibility profiles of ESBL-producing bacteria isolated from urine samples. We also determined the antimicrobial co-resistance to several agents, including fosfomycin.

methodsThe computerized database was used to identify ESBL-positive urine samples. We analyzed E. coli and Klebsiella isolates obtained from urine cultures, and duplicate isolates and isolates not tested against fosfomycin were excluded. The cases were further categorized according to UTI definition [community-acquired (CoA) UTI, community-onset health care-associated (HCA) UTI, and hospital-acquired (HA) UTI]. ESBL isolates were stratified according to their origin into two groups: urology and non-urology isolates.

resultsAntimicrobial susceptibilities of the strains to fosfomycin were tested in 277 ESBL-positive strains, 217 ESBL-EC strains, and 60 ESBL-KP strains. The most effective agents were carbapenems, such as imipenem and meropenem. The least active substances were ciprofloxacin (20.7 %), levofloxacin (22.7 %), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (34.3 %), and ampicillin-clavulanate (42.9 %). Overall, 243 out of the 277 (87.7 %) isolates tested were susceptible to fosfomycin. Higher fosfomycin sensitivity was observed in E. coli (94.9 %) compared to Klebsiella (61.7 %) (p = 0.001). ESBL-positive isolates from urological (68 isolates) and non-urological patients (209 isolates) showed similar susceptibility profiles. Other than carbapenems, isolates from CoA-UTI showed higher sensitivity to fosfomycin (100 %) and nitrofurantoin (93.1 %), isolates from HCA-UTI showed higher sensitivity to amikacin (94.1 %), and isolates from HA-UTI showed overall poor sensitivity to antibiotics.

conclusionsFosfomycin could be an alternative treatment option for UTIs related to ESBL-producing E. coli spp. and CoA-UTI, but not for UTIs related to ESBL-producing Klebsiella spp. Antimicrobial susceptibilities of ESBL-producing strains were different according to the UTI classification. Fosfomycin showed decreased activity against isolates from HCA-UTI and HA-UTI. However, further clinical verification is required to assess the clinical efficacy of fosfomycin for the treatment of UTIs caused by ESBL-producing E. coli isolates.

Indexed as

Cross InfectionEscherichia coliEscherichia coli InfectionsKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeUrinary Tract InfectionsAdolescentAdultAged, 80 and overAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesFemaleFosfomycinHumansMaleMicrobial Sensitivity TestsAnti-Bacterial Agentsbeta-LactamasesFosfomycin

Identifiers

PMID26026972
OpenAlexW2128114271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.