ArticleGraefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie2015
Comparison of epitheliotrophic factors in autologous serum eyedrops from sera of chronic renal failure patients vs. normal controls.
Article in Graefe's archive for clinical and experimental ophthalmology = Albrecht von Graefes Archiv fur klinische und experimentelle Ophthalmologie, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Blood Derivatives in the Therapy of Ocular Surface Diseases.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Blood-Based Treatments for Severe Dry Eye Disease: The Need of a Consensus.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo investigate the composition and biological activity of serum epitheliotrophic factors from chronic renal failure (CRF) patients vs. healthy controls.
methodsTwenty, 50 and 100 % autologous serum eyedrops (ASEs) were prepared from 16 CRF patients and 16 normal subjects. Serum epithelial growth factor (EGF), platelet-derived growth factor-AB (PDGF-AB), transforming growth factor-β1 (TGF-β1) and fibronectin levels were quantified using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits. A 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazolyl-2)-2,5-diphenyltetrazoliumbromide (MTT) assay was used to compare the proliferative effects of serum from CRF patients and healthy donors in a human corneal epithelial cell (HCEC) culture model. Migration assays were conducted via manual scraping of HCECs for migratory potential of ASEs. Morphologic changes were studied with transmission electron microscopy (TEM).
resultsEGF, PDGF-AB and TGF-β1 levels in ASEs from healthy donors were significantly higher than in serum of CRF patients. Cellular proliferation was similar in the CRF patient and normal control groups. ASEs from the normal group had a significantly higher effect on cell migration. ASEs in both groups facilitated better proliferation and migration than the negative control. Furthermore, we observed an enhancement after incubation with diluted serum vs. undiluted serum. In TEM analysis, HCECs incubated with CRF patients' 50 % ASEs showed some loss of microvilli without alterations of cytoplasmic organelles.
conclusionsEpitheliotrophic factors concentrations and biologic activities from CRF patient sera differed from healthy controls. ASEs in CRF patients are also helpful in the corneal healing process, especially when applied at a 50 % concentration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.