Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26026722›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of epidemiology2015

Using scan statistics for congenital anomalies surveillance: the EUROCAT methodology.

Conor Teljeur, Alan Kelly, Maria Loane, James Densem, Helen Dolk

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of epidemiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. EUROCAT: an update on its functions and activities.Journal of community genetics · 2018
    Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Conor TeljeurDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Alan KellyDepartment of Public Health and Primary Care, Trinity College, Dublin, Ireland.
Maria LoaneEUROCAT Central Registry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Shore Rd, Newtownabbey, BT370QB, UK.
James DensemBiomedical Computing Ltd, East Sussex, UK.
Helen DolkEUROCAT Central Registry, WHO Collaborating Centre for Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies, Institute for Nursing and Health Research, University of Ulster, Shore Rd, Newtownabbey, BT370QB, UK. h.dolk@ulster.ac.uk.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Scan statistics have been used extensively to identify temporal clusters of health events. We describe the temporal cluster detection methodology adopted by the EUROCAT (European Surveillance of Congenital Anomalies) monitoring system. Since 2001, EUROCAT has implemented variable window width scan statistic for detecting unusual temporal aggregations of congenital anomaly cases. The scan windows are based on numbers of cases rather than being defined by time. The methodology is imbedded in the EUROCAT Central Database for annual application to centrally held registry data. The methodology was incrementally adapted to improve the utility and to address statistical issues. Simulation exercises were used to determine the power of the methodology to identify periods of raised risk (of 1-18 months). In order to operationalize the scan methodology, a number of adaptations were needed, including: estimating date of conception as unit of time; deciding the maximum length (in time) and recency of clusters of interest; reporting of multiple and overlapping significant clusters; replacing the Monte Carlo simulation with a lookup table to reduce computation time; and placing a threshold on underlying population change and estimating the false positive rate by simulation. Exploration of power found that raised risk periods lasting 1 month are unlikely to be detected except when the relative risk and case counts are high. The variable window width scan statistic is a useful tool for the surveillance of congenital anomalies. Numerous adaptations have improved the utility of the original methodology in the context of temporal cluster detection in congenital anomalies.

Indexed as

Epidemiologic MethodsSpace-Time ClusteringCongenital AbnormalitiesEuropeFemaleHumansMaleModels, TheoreticalMonte Carlo MethodPopulation SurveillancePregnancyRegistriesResearch DesignRiskClustersCongenital anomaliesSurveillance

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.