ArticleJournal of gastroenterology2016
The value of preoperative screening colonoscopies in patients with biliary tract cancer.
Article in Journal of gastroenterology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- High prevalence of advanced colorectal neoplasia in the Thai population: a prospective screening colonoscopy of 1,404 cases.BMC gastroenterology · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the value of preoperative screening colonoscopies in patients with biliary tract cancer.
methodsA total of 544 patients with biliary tract cancer who underwent preoperative screening colonoscopies between January 2005 and December 2012 were retrospectively analyzed.
resultsSynchronous colorectal neoplasia was detected in 199 patients (36.7 %), with adenocarcinomas detected in 21 (3.9 %) patients, carcinoids in two (0.4 %) patients, and adenomas in 176 (32.4 %) patients. Of those with adenomas, 32 patients were diagnosed with advanced adenomas, defined as adenomas with a maximum diameter of >1 cm, villous histology, or high-grade dysplasia because these characteristics implied the risk of malignant transformation. Fifty-five (10.1 %) of the patients with colorectal neoplasia required resection (11 surgical and 44 endoscopic resections). There were no major adverse events related to the resection. Univariate and multivariate analyses revealed that smoking status [ex-smoker + current smoker vs. non-smoker: odds ratio (OR) 2.32; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 1.30-4.21] and advanced age (≥70 vs. ≤69 years: OR 2.22; 95 % CI 1.24-3.91) were independent risk factors of having a colorectal neoplasia that required resection.
conclusionsIn patients with biliary tract cancer, preoperative screening colonoscopy was feasible and provided valuable clinical information. Synchronous colorectal neoplasia was detected in a substantial number of patients. Preoperative screening colonoscopies should be considered especially in high-risk patients such as smokers and elderly patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26026308What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.