Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26025294›Full record

ArticleJournal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine2015

Knowledge and use of wild edible plants in rural communities along Paraguay River, Pantanal, Brazil.

Ieda Maria Bortolotto, Maria Christina de Mello Amorozo, Germano Guarim Neto, Jens Oldeland, Geraldo Alves Damasceno-Junior

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Wild edible plants traditionally collected and used in southern Yemen.Journal of ethnobiology and ethnomedicine · 2021
    Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Ieda Maria BortolottoLaboratory of Botany, Center of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), C.P. 549, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, 79070-900, Brazil. iedamaria.bortolotto@gmail.com.
Maria Christina de Mello AmorozoDepartment of Ecology, IB, UNESP, C.P. 199, 13506-900, Rio Claro, São Paulo, Brazil. mcma@rc.unesp.br.
Germano Guarim NetoDepartment of Botany and Ecology, Bioscience Institute, Federal University of Mato Grosso, 78 060-900, Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil. guarim@cpd.ufmt.br.
Jens OldelandBiodiversity, Evolution and Ecology of Plants, University of Hamburg, Ohnhorststrasse 18, 22609, Hamburg, Germany. oldeland@gmx.de.
Geraldo Alves Damasceno-JuniorLaboratory of Botany, Center of Biological Sciences and Health, Federal University of Mato Grosso do Sul (UFMS), C.P. 549, Campo Grande, Mato Grosso do Sul, 79070-900, Brazil. geraldodamasceno@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWild plants are used as food for human populations where people still depend on natural resources to survive. This study aimed at identifying wild plants and edible uses known in four rural communities of the Pantanal-Brazil, estimating the use value and understanding how distance to the urban areas, gender, age and number of different environments available in the vicinity can influence the knowledge and use of these plants by local people.

methodsData on edible plants with known uses by communities were obtained through semi-structured interviews. A form with standardized information was used for all communities in order to obtain comparable data for analysis. For the quantitative analysis of the factors that could influence the number of species known by the population, a generalized linear model (GLM) was conducted using a negative binomial distribution as the data consisted of counts (number of citations).

resultsA total of 54 wild species were identified with food uses, included in 44 genera and 30 families of angiosperms. Besides food use, the species are also known as medicine, bait, construction, technology and other. The species with the highest use value was Acrocomia aculeata. Older people, aged more than 60 years, and those living in more remote communities farther from cities know more wild edible plants. Statistical analysis showed no difference regarding gender or number of vegetation types available in the vicinity and the number of plants known by locals.

conclusionThis study indicated more knowledge retained in communities more distant from the urban area, indifference in distribution of knowledge between genders and the higher cultural competence of elderly people in respect to knowledge of wild edible botanicals.

Indexed as

Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeNutritive ValueAdultAgedAge FactorsBiodiversityBrazilEthnobotanyFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedParaguayPlants, EdibleRisk Assessment

Identifiers

PMID26025294
PMCPMC4469002

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.