Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024999›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2015

The design of a multicentre Canadian surveillance study of sedation safety in the paediatric emergency department.

Maala Bhatt, Mark G Roback, Gary Joubert, Ken J Farion, Samina Ali, Suzanne Beno, C Michelle McTimoney, Andrew Dixon, Alexander Sasha Dubrovsky, Nick Barrowman and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 8 institutions in 2 countries.

Maala BhattUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Mark G RobackUniversity of Minnesota Masonic Children's Hospital, Minneapolis, Minnesota, USA.
Gary JoubertUniveristy of Western Ontario, London, Ontario, Canada Children's Hospital of Western Ontario, London Health Science Centre, London, Ontario, Canada.
Ken J FarionUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
Samina AliUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Suzanne BenoUniversity of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
C Michelle McTimoneyDalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada IWK Health Center, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Andrew DixonUniversity of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada Stollery Children's Hospital, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Alexander Sasha DubrovskyMcGill University, Montreal, Québec, Canada Montreal Children's Hospital-McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Québec, Canada.
Nick BarrowmanUniversity of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
David W JohnsonUniversity of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada Alberta Children's Hospital, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Sedation Safety Study Group of Pediatric Emergency Research Canada
University of Ottawa · CAStollery Children's Hospital · CAAlberta Children's Hospital · CAIzaak Walton Killam Health Centre · CAMcGill University Health Centre · CAUniversity of Minnesota Children's Hospital · USUniversity of Toronto · CAWestern University · CA

Funding

Canadian Institutes of Health Research FRN-79859
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionProcedural sedation and analgesia have become standard practice in paediatric emergency departments worldwide. Although generally regarded as safe, serious adverse events such as bradycardia, asystole, pulmonary aspiration, permanent neurological injury and death have been reported, but their incidence is unknown due to the infrequency of their occurrence and lack of surveillance of sedation safety. To improve our understanding of the safety, comparative effectiveness and variation in care in paediatric procedural sedation, we are establishing a multicentre patient registry with the goal of conducting regular and ongoing surveillance for adverse events in procedural sedation.

methodsThis multicentre, prospective cohort study is enrolling patients under 18 years of age from six paediatric emergency departments across Canada. Data collection is fully integrated into clinical care and is performed electronically in real time by the healthcare professionals caring for the patient. The primary outcome is the proportion of patients who experience a serious adverse event as a result of their sedation. Secondary outcomes include the proportion of patients who experience an adverse event that could lead to a serious adverse event, proportion of patients who receive a significant intervention in response to an adverse event, proportion of patients who experience a successful sedation, and proportion of patients who experience a paradoxical reaction to sedation. There is no predetermined end date for data collection. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethics approval has been obtained from participating sites. Results will be disseminated using a multifaceted knowledge translation strategy by presenting at international conferences, publication in peer-reviewed journals, and through established networks.

Indexed as

Emergency Service, HospitalAdolescentCanadaChildChild, PreschoolClinical ProtocolsEmergency Medical ServicesHumansHypnotics and SedativesInfantPainPatient SafetyPediatricsProspective StudiesRegistriesResearch DesignHypnotics and SedativesEmergency medicinepediatricsProcedural sedation

Identifiers

PMID26024999
PMCPMC4452752
OpenAlexW2152359611

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.