Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024970›Full record

ReviewMolecular aspects of medicine2015

Turning the headlights on novel cancer biomarkers: Inspection of mechanics underlying intratumor heterogeneity.

Michelle McBride, Padmashree C G Rida, Ritu Aneja

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Molecular aspects of medicine, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. A Quantitative Centrosomal Amplification Score Predicts Local Recurrence of Ductal CarcinomaClinical cancer research : an official journal of the American Association for Cancer Research · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Texture Analysis Improves the Value of PretreatmentContrast media & molecular imaging · 2020
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Overexpression screens identify conserved dosage chromosome instability genes in yeast and human cancer.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2016
    Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Michelle McBrideDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.
Padmashree C G RidaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; Novazoi Theranostics, Inc., Plano, TX 75025, USA.
Ritu AnejaDepartment of Biology, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA; Institute of Biomedical Sciences, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA. Electronic address: raneja@gsu.edu.

Funding

Evaluation of HSET as a Novel Theranostic Target for Breast Cancer TherapyR01CA169127 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2012 to 2016
$1.7M
Evaluation of centrosome amplification as a risk-predictor for breast cancer aggrU01CA179671 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2014 to 2018
$1.6M
Enhancing prognostic power of tumor grade by revisiting Ki67-mitosis relationshipR03CA188527 · NCI · GEORGIA STATE UNIVERSITY · PI ANEJA, RITU · 2015 to 2016
$148k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA169127NCI NIH HHS R03 CA188527NCI NIH HHS U01 CA179671
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although the existence of intratumoral heterogeneity (ITH) in the expression of common biomarkers has been described by pathologists since the late 1890s, we have only recently begun to fathom the staggering extent and near ubiquity of this phenomenon. From the tumor's perspective, ITH provides a stabilizing diversity that allows for the evolution of aggressive cancer phenotypes. As the weight of the evidence correlating ITH to poor prognosis burgeons, it has become increasingly important to determine the mechanisms by which a tumor acquires ITH, find clinically-adaptable means to quantify ITH and design strategies to deal with the numerous profound clinical ramifications that ITH forces upon us. Elucidation of the drivers of ITH could enable development of novel biomarkers whose interrogation might permit quantitative evaluation of the ITH inherent in a tumor in order to predict the poor prognosis risk associated with that tumor. This review proposes centrosome amplification (CA), aided and abetted by centrosome clustering mechanisms, as a critical driver of chromosomal instability (CIN) that makes a key contribution to ITH generation. Herein we also evaluate how a tumor's inherent mitotic propensity, which reflects the cell cycling kinetics within the tumor's proliferative cells, functions as the indispensable engine underpinning CIN, and determines the rate of CIN. We thus expound how the forces of centrosome amplification and mitotic propensity collaborate to sculpt the genetic landscape of a tumor and spawn extensive subclonal diversity. As such, centrosome amplification and mitotic propensity profiles could serve as clinically facile and powerful prognostic biomarkers that would enable more accurate risk segmentation of patients and design of individualized therapies.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCentrosomeChromosomal InstabilityDisease ProgressionHumansMitosisNeoplasmsPrognosisBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerCentrosomesChromosomal instabilityIntratumoral heterogeneityMitotic propensity

Identifiers

PMID26024970
PMCPMC4780421

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.