Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024918›Full record

ReviewEuropace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology2015

State of the art of leadless pacing.

Johannes Sperzel, Haran Burri, Daniel Gras, Fleur V Y Tjong, Reinoud E Knops, Gerhard Hindricks, Clemens Steinwender, Pascal Defaye

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
10.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 78 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Comparison of in-hospital outcomes and complications of leadless pacemaker and traditional transvenous pacemaker implantation.Europace : European pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac electrophysiology : journal of the working groups on cardiac pacing, arrhythmias, and cardiac cellular electrophysiology of the European Society of Cardiology · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Comparison between leadless and transvenous single-chamber pacemaker therapy in a referral centre for lead extraction.Journal of interventional cardiac electrophysiology : an international journal of arrhythmias and pacing · 2021
    Article
  8. A Multi-Dimensional Analysis of a Novel Approach for Wireless Stimulation.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2020
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Leadless solution for arrhythmia-related sudden unexpected death in epilepsy.Proceedings (Baylor University. Medical Center) · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Artefacts in 1.5 Tesla and 3 Tesla cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in patients with leadless cardiac pacemakers.Journal of cardiovascular magnetic resonance : official journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance · 2018
    Observational
  16. Imaging features of leadless cardiovascular devices.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2018
    Review
  17. Safety and Efficacy of Leadless Pacemakers: A New Era of Pacing.The Journal of innovations in cardiac rhythm management · 2018
    Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 7 institutions in 5 countries.

Johannes SperzelDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff Heart and Thorax Center, Bad Nauheim, Germany j.sperzel@kerckhoff-klinik.de.
Haran BurriCardiology Service, University Hospital of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Daniel GrasDepartment of Cardiology, Nouvelles Cliniques Nantaises, Nantes, France.
Fleur V Y TjongDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Reinoud E KnopsDepartment of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Gerhard HindricksHeart Center, University Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Clemens SteinwenderDept. of Cardiology, Linz General Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria.
Pascal DefayeArrythmia Unit, Cardiology Department, University Hospital of Grenoble, Grenoble, France.
University of Amsterdam · NLCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Grenoble · FRJohannes Kepler University of Linz · ATKerckhoff Klinik · DELeipzig Heart Institute · DENouvelles Cliniques Nantaises · FRUniversity Hospital of Geneva · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite undisputable benefits, conventional pacemaker therapy is associated with specific complications related to the subcutaneous device and the transvenous leads. Recently, two miniaturized leadless pacemakers, Nanostim™ (St. Jude Medical) and Micra™ (Medtronic), which can be completely implanted inside the right ventricle using steerable delivery systems, entered clinical application. The WiCS™-cardiac resynchronisation therapy (CRT) system (wireless cardiac stimulation for CRT, EBR Systems) delivers leadless left ventricular endocardial stimulation for cardiac resynchronization. In addition to obvious cosmetic benefits, leadless pacing systems may have the potential to overcome some complications of conventional pacing. However, acute and long-term complications still remains to be determined, as well as the feasibility of device explantation years after device placement.

Indexed as

Cardiac CathetersCardiac Resynchronization Therapy DevicesEndocardiumEquipment DesignHeart VentriclesHumansProstheses and ImplantsTreatment OutcomeCatheter deliveryLeadless pacingPacemaker

Identifiers

PMID26024918
PMCPMC4617371
OpenAlexW2126563732

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.