Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26024893›Full record

ArticleAmerican journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology2015

Longitudinal in vivo microcomputed tomography of mouse lungs: No evidence for radiotoxicity.

Greetje Vande Velde, Ellen De Langhe, Jennifer Poelmans, Peter Bruyndonckx, Emiliano d'Agostino, Erik Verbeken, Ria Bogaerts, Rik Lories, Uwe Himmelreich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in American journal of physiology. Lung cellular and molecular physiology, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Frontiers in medicine · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Greetje Vande VeldeBiomedical MRI Unit/MoSAIC, Department Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;
Ellen De LangheLaboratory of Tissue Homeostasis and Disease, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Flanders, Belgium;
Jennifer PoelmansBiomedical MRI Unit/MoSAIC, Department Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;
Peter BruyndonckxBruker microCT, Kontich, Belgium;
Emiliano d'AgostinoSB Dosimetry and Calibration, Institute for Environment, Health and Safety, Belgian Nuclear Research Centre, SCK·CEN, Mol, Belgium;
Erik VerbekenTranslational Cell and Tissue Research, Department Imaging and Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; and.
Ria BogaertsLaboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rik LoriesLaboratory of Tissue Homeostasis and Disease, Skeletal Biology and Engineering Research Center, Department of Development and Regeneration, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium; Division of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Flanders, Belgium; rik.lories@med.kuleuven.be.
Uwe HimmelreichBiomedical MRI Unit/MoSAIC, Department Imaging & Pathology, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium;

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Before microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) can be exploited to its full potential for longitudinal monitoring of transgenic and experimental mouse models of lung diseases, radiotoxic side effects such as inflammation or fibrosis must be considered. We evaluated dose and potential radiotoxicity to the lungs for long-term respiratory-gated high-resolution micro-CT protocols. Free-breathing C57Bl/6 mice underwent four different retrospectively respiratory gated micro-CT imaging schedules of repeated scans during 5 or 12 wk, followed by ex vivo micro-CT and detailed histological and biochemical assessment of lung damage. Radiation exposure, dose, and absorbed dose were determined by ionization chamber, thermoluminescent dosimeter measurements and Monte Carlo calculations. Despite the relatively large radiation dose delivered per micro-CT acquisition, mice did not show any signs of radiation-induced lung damage or fibrosis when scanned weekly during 5 and up to 12 wk. Doubling the scanning frequency and once tripling the radiation dose as to mimic the instant repetition of a failed scan also stayed without detectable toxicity after 5 wk of scanning. Histological analyses confirmed the absence of radiotoxic damage to the lungs, thereby demonstrating that long-term monitoring of mouse lungs using high-resolution micro-CT is safe. This opens perspectives for longitudinal monitoring of (transgenic) mouse models of lung diseases and therapeutic response on an individual basis with high spatial and temporal resolution, without concerns for radiation toxicity that could potentially influence the readout of micro-CT-derived lung biomarkers. This work further supports the introduction of micro-CT for routine use in the preclinical pulmonary research field where postmortem histological approaches are still the gold standard.

Indexed as

AnimalsDose-Response Relationship, RadiationLungMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLX-Ray Microtomographydosimetryin vivo lung imagingMonte Carloradiation safety

Identifiers

PMID26024893
PMCPMC4525121

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.